Benjamin Fulford: U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner arrested

Here is a detailed report by a reporter that says the Treasury Department would neither confirm or deny the report.
www.lsnewsgroup.com...

That to me adds a lot of credibility to Fulford's statement.

I do believe Fulford was not fully accurate when he said Geithner was not allowed to leave the country. I believe that statement should have had the caveat "except for official business". As a cabinet Secretary, I'm sure he travels with a security detail while on official business and with a diplomatic passport. . And if Fulford is right, that security detail most likely has orders to not only keep him in their sight at all times (which they would do anyway) but to make sure he doesn't go near a foreign embassy where me might possibly be able to request political asylum. That would be the only way he could "escape".

If he wasn't allowed to leave the country for official business, he would most likely need to be suspended from his job by the President since he would not be able to perform his job, which may be the next step.

Originally posted by fah0436
Here is a detailed report by a reporter that says the Treasury Department would niehter confirm or deny the report.
www.lsnewsgroup.com...

That to me adds a lot of credibility to Fulfords statement.

What a crock - the request was to confirm the reports -

Can you confirm or deny these reports? If the reports are true can you comment on the reasons Secretary Geithner was arrested?

the reply was

I haven’t seen those reports – can you please send?

...and this is taken as neither confirm nor deny??

Pathetic!

Thank god for this you can see the evil in his eyes when he speaks on television. These are the people who have hijacked the nation and they must be brought to justice immediately.!

Ben "BS" Fulford comes up with some good ones but too bad none of it is ever true.

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul


Did you miss this part of the report?????

Despite our timely response to Ms. Wyeth’s request for the reports to be sent her, she did not respond confirming or denying the reports. We find the Treasury Departments inability to comfirm or deny a very straight forward report somewhat disheartening coming from an adminstration which has repeatedly portrayed itself as being the most transparent administration in US history.

reply to post by fah0436


Refer back to this post.

reply to post by fah0436


No I didn't miss that - I find it extraordinary that they can publish emails of the initial exchange, but not subsequent ones to back up that claim either.

also the lack of response is said to be an "inability to comfirm or deny a very straight forward report " - no evidence is provided that they are UNABLE to confirm or deny.

It is just carp sensationalist reporting

reply to post by boncho


I thought i had read everything, but obviously i missed that.
Thanks.

Lies. Fulford is an embarrassment.

BOOOO!!!! GET OFF!

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by fah0436

 

No I didn't miss that - I find it extraordinary that they can publish emails of the initial exchange, but not subsequent ones to back up that claim either.

also the lack of response is said to be an "inability to comfirm or deny a very straight forward report " - no evidence is provided that they are UNABLE to confirm or deny.

It is just carp sensationalist reporting

Obviously you didn't see this part:

Despite our timely response to Ms. Wyeth’s request for the reports to be sent her, she did not respond confirming or denying the reports.

No response usually means that they don't want to talk about it. Especially if they were already replying to earlier emails.

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by Honor93

 

Yes. There was a guard at the G20 in Mexico to make sure Geithner didn't flee the country.

you know this how ???

Fulfords own link states that he was put under guard so he would not "leave the country".

ppl who are on probation are not allowed to "leave" their county but guess what?
waivers are frequently granted to allow said travel.
(might be what happened w/Mexico - he was on business, remember?)

and for the record, being restricted from fleeing the country does not automatically impinge business operations (especially governmental ones) ... if you believe a guard was assigned, chances are he was present in Mexico, but where's your proof? of any of it.

The video and the link set a timeline. On the 24th Geithner was on tv and on the 25th he was in Mexico. Fulford states that one the 24th he was detained and released, and put under guard so he couldn't leave the country. But he did, he went to mexico.

perhaps, Fulfords English was a bit expansive considering you nor he have shown that a guard was NOT present in Mexico.

In spite of all this u want to believe the person who claims HAARP cause the Japanese quake, and the same person who says he has an army of 10,000 ninja assassins.

WHAT ???
what are you talking about ??
if these are beliefs of Fulford then apparently you didn't absorb the part where i said i don't follow his ramblings.

Also his background(which you seem to doubt) about working at forbes etc is true, it is not hard to find evidence of this, at least. www.forbes.com...

edit on 28-2-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)

No, its not that I dont doubt it - I have seen him in Forbes interviews (there was one when he was interviewing a Rothschild ... or Rockerfeller), it's just all a bit weird and just doesn't feel right. I would like to see some stuff of him talking about this on video (YouTube here i come), I think it would be easier to gauge his integrity hearing him speak.

He could be a complete stooge, he could be completely genuine. My main concern is that he belittles his post with his religious vocabulary he uses. If he is revealing cover ups, fraudelent goings on and secret squirrel type stuff, he should realise that religion is the biggest control mechanism of the lot!

reply to post by Honor93


I see you have moved into a comedy routine now.

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by Honor93

 

I see you have moved into a comedy routine now.

glad you enjoyed it, care to share any proof of your claim ?
when the Feds refuse to respond to a media request for confirmation, that's usually a red flag that something is going on with the 'claims' submitted for confirmation.
guess time will tell, won't it ??

reply to post by Honor93


Well that's your problem. It's not my claim. Its Fulford's claim, and not only did he not provide anything to back it up, there is readily available evidence to contradict what he said. But now you are expanding on his claim to make up for the inconsistencies.*1

So now it is your claim.

*1 First it was that he wasn't allowed to leave the country, but no he supposedly is because it was official business.



As I said, you found a nice little comedy routine.

Originally posted by AzureSky

I think he might be a little quirky......

Certainly under a lot of pressure.

A friend who has lived in Japan for 20 years told me years ago that he had begun to think in Japanese and had to mentally translate everything before he spoke in English. He also told me that the way the Japanese language works is very different, it's not as simple as translating French to English for example. There are many videos of Fulford speaking in what appears to be fluent Japanese. I expect he has all kinds of problems with his presentation.

Here's a recent video.




Watch this one from 2 minutes onwards to learn more about the gentleman sitting opposite Fulford, Chodoin Daikaku.






Also this which may throw a little light on the ninjas for world peace claim. This article led me to wonder if Michael Jackson was framed.



www.japantimes.co.jp...

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by Honor93

 

Well that's your problem. It's not my claim. Its Fulford's claim, and not only did he provide anything to back it up, there is readily available evidence to contradict what he said. But now you are expanding on his claim to make up for the inconsistencies.*1

So now it is your claim.

*1 First it was that he wasn't allowed to leave the country, but no he supposedly is because it was official business.

As I said, you found a nice little comedy routine.

wow, this is getting downright pathetic.
i made no claims and have no problem with this info or source.

you were the one who posted the video and claimed it debunked the whole theory/accusation.
^^^^^^^^^^ your claim, not mine.
i simply questioned your willingness to excuse a 25.5 hr time frame with a 15min video clip.

i don't see any credible evidence to refute Fulfords claim ... you tried but i disagree.
and no, i'm not contradicting his claim, i'm contradicting yours. (see above)

i never claimed G wasn't allowed to leave the country, Fulford did.
i clarified that (official/governmental) business travel is seldom restricted even though he might not be allowed to leave the country.

you choose to argue all of the points made and claim there is evidence to the contrary ... well, let's see it.

and i still hold to ... IF he was escorted in Mexico, how would you know?

Frauds like him are very clever, they spend their days creating paths through, around and in between truth.

Until we see an arrest report, Fulford has nothing. Geithner's status has not changed.

reply to post by Honor93

i don't see any credible evidence to refute Fulfords claim ... you tried but i disagree.
and no, i'm not contradicting his claim, i'm contradicting yours.

The burden is not on me to provide evidence for Fulford's claims. He made a claim, which was contradictory to the events of that day. He said Geithner was released and put under armed guard not allowed to leave the country, and then Geithner left the country.

!!!!!!!!

Fulford debunked himself and now you are making excuses for him

Yes, there could have been a someone guarding him in Mexico and he was only allowed to leave because of official business, and also the tooth fairy could have come and helped Geithner escape afterward. That's your argument.

You are just making up new areas of the story to support Fulford.

I could just as easily claim Obama went to the Moon yesterday, but surely the onus of proof is not supposed to be left on you. Or perhaps it should be, and you can make something up to cancel out anything that contradicts my claim.

Obama was on the moon yesterday...

Go!