.Dinosaurs Never Existed.

I have been to dig sites - you don't exist.

reply to post by diamondsmith


It's never one or the other but always both. Just matters how much of each is true and how much is false.

it would be too easy to figure out that way.

Originally posted by diamondsmith
If there was Adam and Eve then...Dinosaurs never existed.

Just a theory

Records of the existence of dinosaurs may have been intended by who has created Adam and Eve.

If this true then all we know about the history of our planet can be wrong.

There is to much so called proof of dinosaurs existence but their sudden disappearance is not explained in any way.

Only pieces of stones called bones assembled and that should tell us something about the past history of our planet.

But what if everything is false to mislead us by making us believe that dinosaurs existed, what would be the reason!

Why someone would load us with false history and also to make us believe we came from Adam and Eve.

Something is wrong here,to reconcile the two theories, on the one hand the existence of dinosaurs and on the other hand our origin.

So,what do you think,Adam and Eve or the Dinosaurs!

Um, dude. Proof of dinosaurs exist. Proof of Adam and Eve doesn't.


Which is fake, I wonder?


Come on, use some common sense next time, If I could neg rep or black flag this thread I would.

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by ClydeFrog42

 

All I stated is true as I explained before and they are all related,because,


I never Lie.

So... when you say something completely stupid and wrong... such as.... and i quote:

Today there is not any ideology, the world is guided by other principles.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thats not a lie?

Even if your too dumb to know otherwise, your still lying...

Lol. "guided by other principles"... such as? your suggesting that THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is ideology free... that is the most laughable proposition I have ever heard.

lawlz.

Adam and eve = real
dinasaurs = fake
American politics = random series of uncoordinated and ideology free decisions
100 years from now = war will have killed everyone

You sure have an.... "interesting" worldview... to put it lightly.

Oh wait, not interesting... what was that word... the word... im looking for..... OH YEAH!!! STUPID!

I maintain my hateful position. Hate is perfectly warranted in the face of purposefully intended idiocy. If propagating bull# isn't lying, then nothing is.

What proof do we have that the 19th century happened?
I mean..besides the proof..but whats to say all that isn't just a hoax and the universe is actually less than 100 years old?!!

reply to post by leemachino


Read your own post.

It's called the impact THEORY.........

once again that is theory....not fact.

big difference.

Originally posted by LucidDreamer85
reply to post by leemachino

 

Read your own post.

It's called the impact THEORY.........

once again that is theory....not fact.

big difference.

Can you explain to me the difference between a scientific hypothesis and a scientific theory?

thanks.

reply to post by ClydeFrog42

Thats not a lie?

Unfortunately that is not a lie.

Is the power of knowledge.

diamondsmith.

I have just noticed that you have authored 243 threads in the past 4 months. Some of which I have come across before, and all of those, typically, are meandering pointless quasi-theories, and usually devoid of logic.

What's your excuse, a professional troll? A complete loon?

reply to post by LucidDreamer85

It's never one or the other but always both. Just matters how much of each is true and how much is false.

But we never ask why!

reply to post by diamondsmith


tu est en retard

No chance EVER

diamondsmith

reply to post by ClydeFrog42


ahahahaha

When a post 7 pages into your thread - simply calling you an idiot - gets more stars than your very first post... there is something seriously wrong with you.

Of course, no news there. Just thought id take the opportunity to laugh at you and call you stupid once more.

reply to post by Helmkat

Birds are part of the Dinosaur lineage though.

Then we evolved from birds.

reply to post by diamondsmith


So, question for you

Why would you believe in Adam/Eve and not Dinos? There is no evidence beyond a caveman story about such things...
and its not like Adam kept a diary at that...

evidence actually pretty much dismisses this hypothetical story.

So, why would you decide to go with that?
Also, why that specific creation story? There are dozens of creation stories throughout religions past and present...all equally valid in regards to evidence..

Many wish many things....well...how disappointing for you

.Dinosaurs Never Existed.

As the title say.

Not this again....

Alright, I'll play along.

There is a plethora of evidence for Dinosaurs, but none for "Adam and Eve". If they truly existed and Dinosaurs did not, why is there evidence of Dinosaurs but not of "Adam and Eve"?

reply to post by diamondsmith


*facepalm*

Look at this.



Should give you a basic idea of evolution.

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by Flavian

 

Why not both though

Can not coexist as long as were not fit as time period.

Wanted to touch on this

explain Job then:
Job: 40 15-19

15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.
16 Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
18 His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.
19 He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.

So, the bible is not speaking of a dino then with a tail like a tree...

reply to post by SaturnFX

evidence actually pretty much dismisses this hypothetical story.

I know that,is just an theory as all are+ some bones.