Ok... some may not think this is very important but I'd like everyone to take a look at something that to me, seems quite odd. First I am going to
give my interpretation in brief and then post some wikipedia links. Sure, I'd like to use a better source but who knows... it MIGHT be true. Some
wikipedia links are at least. This is part of the reason I'd like everyone else to take a look. I'd like to get this straight in my mind.
Ok, so let's begin at some point in china's past after feudalism and the need for political reform. This gave rise to the birth of the Nationalist
party... I think. there was a group of 4 students called the four bandits who were attempting to overthrow the Qing dynasty or something along that
line. You can find articles on this as well to brush up. Somehow these people were related to the guy who founded the Nationalist party and his sister
married Chiang Kai Shek who went on to be the leader of the Nationalist party... but I am really confused about his position. I certainly agree more
with the nationalists stance than the communist that wound up taking over all of china, but sketchy things started happening... and you know who was
all involved... the good ol US soooo... Who knows what is REALLY happening... especially with this piece that I just read.
Ok, so after ww2 and the defeat of Japan, The Nationalist party wins Taiwan but the Chinese civil war between communists and nationalists is also
happening. Many people do not realize how closely related Chinese politics was with ww2. In this time period after ww2 between 45 and 49, the
nationalist loose ALL of mainland China... big defeat, but Taiwan seems to have major connections with the US, the global heroes at the time and I was
told that Taiwan would go on to be where the US hid the Titan missiles and this is why Taiwan was not taken with mainland China...which makes me
wonder. i did not read that, I was told that and have not yet researched it because it really doesn't surprise me but I'm sure I'll get around to
looking into it.
Ok...so in 45 the UN was formed and began acquiring members representing nations around the world.
When you read about the Chinese civil war you will read that fighting ceased but that it is technically still ongoing through arguments and disputes.
People do not realize that Taiwan was under martial law for 38 years after moving it's government from china to Taiwan after being defeated by the
communists. now, the communist were led by Mao Zedong who was a murderous man and is said to be responsible for the death of millions but in many ways
is upheld as the leader who sorted out a lot of political problems by brute force and helped to construct the china we see today, which has some
strict policies but is clearly a main global player.
the nationalism that you read about before the Chinese civil war, which involved a lot of reform... is much different in my opinion than the
nationalism seen late in the civil war and afterwards(38 years of martial law) For example, the 228 incident was an uprising that broke out in Taiwan
by the people who lived there and well, a lot like communists.... the government violently suppressed it. Oh, now they are all about democracy and
that was the nationalist dream all along.... social and political reform... but this incident which started as a protest of the people led to tens of
anyway... now Taiwan has a presidential system and has one of the strongest world economies and has strong views in support of things like freedom of
the press and other democratic ideas.
Taiwan supposedly argues that it is the appropriate government that should be running all of china including mainland. China says that Taiwan belongs
to the government of china.... hence, the ongoing civil war.
However, Taiwan has a pretty sturdy government in place just like China so therefore, who can really take who without another war?
Well.... just like israel, look what the good old Un has to say about it.
Is that war begun and already over with a magical wag of the UNs tongue?
Now go to this link and click on the UNs gradual accumulation of more member states and now tell me who is forming a one world globalist system. you
click on the timeline and it shows you the build up past the formation of the UN till 08. Now read below the picture and see what is says about Kosovo
and Taiwan. It calls Taiwan a province of The PRC (which is the government of mainland china) when clearly taiwan already has a successful government
of it's own and apparently fought for it tooth and nail... for the UN to just say.. "nope, you belong to china"
When did this happen?
So maybe this explains some of my suspicions with Chiang Kai shek and the deals he made with the US and why in many ways he kinda appears to be just
another US puppet.
What the nationalist appear to have won is an illusion of their own government lasting a few decades to let some of the old bad blood settle (let old
folks who really know what is going on die off and forget)...and now it will simply be just referred to as a province of china whether true
nationalists like it or not.
I think the real nationalist party might have just dissolved after the loss of China and the US forms a puppet government in TAIWAN.... simply calls
it the ROC letting the people think they are self ruling and appear to be so in culture and class.... for the UN to just hand it back to communist
China IN WORDS?
It's not even the same type of governemt so how is this going to play out in action and who has the right to do such a thing... and why? does it have
to do with US and European debt? Did we hand somebody elses country to another country we happen to owe a lot of money to?
Kinda sounds like it my opinion.... somebody please clear this up for me.
And now how much territory falls under UN influence before the UN is "suggesting" to the entire world what to do?
Scroll down to about half the page and look beside "members" and read the paragraph under the picture... click the picture to get to the flash
version or whatever and watch the progression.
Is it just me or does this seem sickeningly weird?
please, tell me I'm wrong and explain to me how this is good, right and appropriate and does not reak of globalist agenda.