reply to post by Alfie1
Get me your source link, to show the readers their exact words about those 1-2 secs..
And guess what, the huge seismic waves are still in front of the writing of the Cianca moment on my big graph, even when you take the "worst case"
scenario, by taking the maximum relative error off from the Cianca time writing by the seismograph needle. The fat vertical red line with "LDEO
time" in its top.
You also seem to have a reading problem when viewing my graph, you missed my 2x2 secs vertical thin blue lines connected with a thin horizontal blue
line with the words RELATIVE ERROR in it. Spanning the 17 seconds gap.
As usual you guys come only up with hogwash, you will never address the meat of the matter :
THE DAMN HUGE PEAK BEFORE ANYBODY SAW THE BUILDING SHOW ANY SIGN OF MOVEMENT AT ALL.
Exactly appearing in the seismogram at the moment you hear in that NIST video, that low explosion sound, muffled by the ground and all the buildings
between the camera and WTC 7. They had already for a few hours swept the whole 4 blocks around the WTC 7 clean from any curious bystanders. FDNY
This post by Iwinder at page 5
in the thread titled :
PBS broadcast of “Solving the Mystery of WTC7″ reaches 2.7 Million Americans
tells all the readers at ATS in a few well phrased answers what the basics of JREF fanatics their multi-thousands posting habits are, i.o.w. what
guys like you, your real intentions seem to be, according to your own words and online behavior.
I can only see a massive work in progress to destabilize all the 9/11 efforts to get the real truth out.
You constantly invade good threads, to flood them with needless posts, hoping the casual, still not convinced readers will hook-off. And most of the
time you succeed, since not one forum owner wants-to or has yet found a good solution for this behavior.
We had a good working alternative in the early nineties web days already. Let the OP click/roll-up annoying posts to a single tab, that can be
clicked/opened again by everyone of his readers, if they want.
That way your cleaned-up thread looks as you want to show it to serious readers, however nothing is really lost, and very curious readers can click a
green tab above the opening post, that rolls open all closed by the OP posts in one move.
That was simple programming, said our young ADMIN in those days. He could talk to you while he typed Machine language programming on his screen. He
was half Chinese and now a world-famous nuclear physicist at (redacted).
Interesting to try that out in this 9/11 forum. It would instantly cure us from JREFers wrecking all threads the last years. And also show to the
readers how good any thread in fact is.
The same type of characters used the same roll up technique of course back on us, but in the end they found out that they got no visitors anymore in
their own started threads.
In the end we had only serious posting behavior. And of course the sequential passing lunatic. Who got banned after we had fun with him or her. One we
kept. He was so extremely funny we all cried bitter tears when we heard he hung himself.
A hundred years of seismic research in that region, btw also backed up by these two men, have always resulted in that 2 km per second traveling time
through the upper crust, for specific seismic waves.
Deducted from thousands of small and bigger seismic events where the original position was exactly known, and start time was known in thousands of a
second exact. Measured by an atomic clock.
The specific waves that are depicted in that very early (Wednesday for the 1 and 2 towers and Friday for WTC 7) published seismogram, that NIST has
tried to falsify with every trick in the book.
They have deleted all later than that first week's work by Dr Kim from their websites, they even payed him to work for them and then DELETED his
second report from 2006.
Because he did not wanted to alter his first results. He knew that he would get all his colleagues over him, when he would alter the well known 2 km
per second time.
And about your assumption that a photo by NIST can not be that precisely clocked : hogwash!
Read the NIST report again, and their meticulous work done on ALL video and photo material, to get cross checked atomic clock aided results for every
video clip and photo of the day of 9/11.
I just wiped you off my suspect list, since obviously you do not even take the time to read the NIST report, so how on earth could you ever read the
instructions on how to hack a huge bulletin board?