reply to post by Reheat
Because you are one of my top twenty suspects of having hacked my ATS account password here half of January, and publicize it on some upload site,
together with a bus load of other valued ATS members their passwords. And to wipe part of my 9/11 research from my computer.
As most old members know by now, I prepare my posts in advance, and then post them at once, to spare my threads from the same stupid one line
in-between posts you see in this thread also shoveled in by clearly non 9/11 researchers.
I had about 1 gigabyte of Wordpad text windows with loads of photos and drawings saved in my computer, and to be safe, also duplicated it on an
external memory stick, that's two different sources.
And a small part of it contained a full rebuttal of your frivolous ASCE-arguments in that thread you now talk about, it proved to you that the ASCE
Pentagon paper did contain everything you did not wanted to read, namely that their own researchers were only allowed a whopping 4 hours to visit the
site and do some measurements, AFTER the whole damn site was meticulously cleaned by the military, so they had no chance at all to find a shimmer of
an airplane part at all.
All researchers expressed their doubt about the scientifically worthiness of their own report, in that same report.
You only have to read it's own pages, but you will deny that, because that's what a good JREF'er does all the time.
Thus I could not react because the same guy who hacked my and other members their account, obviously also had access to my computer, because when I
tried to log in at ATS again after I had ended my prepared posts, my saved Wordpad window AND my attached memory stick were suddenly EMPTY.
And I got a message from the Board staff here that I was one of the affected and hacked members. So I got a new password from Djarums, an
administrator here. I told him what happened to my GB's of hard work, and I really hope they will get a hold on that piss poor character who did
I had made half a GB worth of posts in advance, to also show you and your mean buddies at JREF that the gouge in the generator trailer roof you so
friendly posted to impress me in that thread, in fact boosted my arguments about a NoC approach and following impact of AA77, since the angle of the
gouge indicates clearly a 70° to 80° angle against the west wall line of the Pentagon, and not the damn 42° angle of attack that that piece of
dis-info report by the ASCE organization, lead by the same military fellow that lead the Oklahoma bombing dis-investigation, came up with.
They had to, because the internal damage they found after the military clean up, and the 5 downed light poles predicted that 42° flight path by a SoC
incoming plane. They had to follow the official line-lie.
But the NoC witnesses broke up their little fairy tale, and started me and a lot of other members, to doubt that SoC official line.
And thus, your posted gouge with that 70° to 80° angle of attack of the incoming plane proves that a NoC flight path ending at the second floor slab
in the west wall is not only possible, but indeed happened.
It was either caused by one of the sharp rimmed outer guide rails for the right wing slaps, 80 cm under that right wing, or by the right wing tip.
Probst was the man who told in that ASCE report that he saw that the right wing tip slashed through the generator trailer.
Look what type of slander you JREF people use all the time, it's so disgusting any normal person has to puke when they have to read it, and it is now
aided by cowards who use their IT knowledge to stop neutral 9/11 investigators like me from posting more and more evidence, every day that passes.
You will not succeed, Wisdom will Win in the end.