It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WikiLeaks begins publishing 5 million emails from STRATFOR

page: 23
224
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Realtruth
 


Could you cut and paste a little?




posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:16 PM
link   
Not a lawyer but have seen people go to prison for being around when someone offed someone else!



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:16 PM
link   
It looks to me like someone is having a laugh at the expense of STRATFOR; possibly the same people who put together and distributed that fake Friedman resignation e-mail.

Some of these 'emails' are really quite funny, but it appears that a lot of you are taking them seriously. If reading that glossary doesn't raise eyebrows then you really can't be helped.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:17 PM
link   
reply to post by ajay59
 


Wonder if being under a corporate umbrella protects them, I guess.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:18 PM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


This is the message I get trying to follow your link

LOL, looks like I am in no way shape or form going to be able to view that information!!



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Soshh
 


I am under the thinking that there might be some fraudulent info coming at us also, but 5 million emails? Don't think it's all fake.

Still waiting, of course,



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunnyDee
reply to post by ajay59
 


Wonder if being under a corporate umbrella protects them, I guess.


That's the problem with large corporations, who is ever held accountable?

Classic example: Wall Street.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by SunnyDee
reply to post by Realtruth
 


Could you cut and paste a little?


theres some on like page 5 of this thread



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:21 PM
link   
reply to post by SunnyDee
 



Capital crime is capital crime. If you willingly with hold info that makes you an accomplice!



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by Highground
reply to post by TKDRL
 


Wikileaks/Anonymous commits illegal acts to get the truth, and it's okay. STRATFOR potentially commits illegal acts to get the truth, and they're evil.

Just interesting to me.


I think the difference is privatized truth vs. open truth.

Wikileaks is releasing the information to the public, Stratfor was going to open up a trading firm that used legal loopholes to profit off inside information.



I don't really want to argue the morality of it all, but I wouldn't act as though the people caught in the loop are innocent either. The focus on banks, firms like this, government is the same focus that has been used to ostracize and alienate regular people for many years.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:22 PM
link   
reply to post by TheGuyFawkes
 


Yes, I saw that list. I didn't see any of the bigger american media in that list. Are there any of those?

Sorry for the short post.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:23 PM
link   
reply to post by MyMindIsMyOwn
 


We are sorry,

Site is undergoing a maintenance, please try again later.

I am pretty sure the link will work after the mainenance lol.

Here is a link to grab it. It is an xls document, openoffice opens it up, I think microsoft excel will too.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by MyMindIsMyOwn
reply to post by TKDRL
 


This is the message I get trying to follow your link

LOL, looks like I am in no way shape or form going to be able to view that information!!


Try this one instead. Click around till you find it.
edit on 27-2-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:25 PM
link   
it's like saying a child molester is in his right of liberty if he gets off on a technicality. Even if he paid the judge, jury and all involved to create the technicality.

To defend this is wrong and makes everyone suspect. I would really reconsider damage control, it only encourages the opponent in this situation. Which is the general public.

No one in their right mind will have a problem with this. Unless they have vested interests. I am not saying people are shills for doing so, but what rational person says it is ok to let a child molester free due to technicalities.

If it happens people lose trust in the system. If you defend this you lose the trust of your peers.

wrong, ok,

what is the greater wrong. Killing people is wrong, yet we go to war to kill the Hitlers of the world do we not.

It is wrong to steal, yet we confiscate criminal funds.

It is wrong to hold someone against their will, yet we put people in prison.

It is wrong to threaten the freedom and safety of my people, so we steal emails and expose fraud.

This is why one must follow the spririt of the law, and not the literal words of it.
They are just a guide, but when they are corrupted and twisted, the guide is always the spirit.

I am sorry, this is a good thing. It had to happen. They have not left the unavoidable truth any other option.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:26 PM
link   
I have not had the time to watch or read the MSM. Has there been any mention of this?



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:26 PM
link   
Edit: I was going to say it was breaking that anonymous is claiming to have forged e-mails but that may just be old news repeated, I'll wait for confirmation either way
edit on 27-2-2012 by Xieon because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Soshh
 


yes i would agree some of them are quite funny and they are just conversational banter between individuals who seem to work for an intelligence gathering agency....but when on looks at the names...the sender and the reciever and the dates and put them together with issues being discussed....it seems to fit into a chronological timeline.....so what i am gathering from you is...hoax......or am i wrong there.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:27 PM
link   
reply to post by SunnyDee
 


nah its just a bunch of terms they use and the meanings of the terms



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:31 PM
link   
i am DL the file on the wikileaks main page and it seems many of the individual files in the 149gb of file there is a great amount of viral infections......hit 17 or so so far......so if your going to download the file make sure your checking it.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Xieon
 


That is the biggest problem I have with these kinds of links. I try my best to verify info, it's in my nature. There is no way for me to vefiry anything, it frustrates me to no end.




top topics



 
224
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join