It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Manula
reply to post by Lionhearte
If its like maths whats your answer?
Originally posted by absolutely
reply to post by Lionhearte
bc truth in truth is not an equation but a fact of absolute superiority values right to exist always
Originally posted by calnorak
reply to post by Lionhearte
Yes but you are still focusing on "4".
Originally posted by Lionhearte
Originally posted by Manula
Well is there?
Everybody has its own formula, there are tons of books telling you the real answer.
Do you still believe there is a one-fits all theory about life?
I am not saying there isn't...
I think each life has its own meaning, its own theory that works, its own explanations.
But is there a common goal to all humans?
The concept of 'Life' is like a math formula, and can be as simple as 2 + 2.
No one respond with that "no right or wrong beliefs" or "different viewpoints" excuse, either. 2 + 2 will always equal 4. If anyone believes it equals -12, they will be wrong.
There can be only one answer. If you want; only one way, truth, and life.
If you disagree, by default you believe 2 + 2 can = ∞
Math is the invention of man =) so that could be debated
Originally posted by NorEaster
Yes, there is one overarching reason for life - all life - within a reality confine like the one we inhabit. In fact, this specific reality confine was initiated for one and only one reason. The thing is that regardless of how very specific the reason for our own, or any reality confine, is, the primordial driver for all that exists and does anything whatsoever is raw survival, and even though it gets pretty difficult to recognize this within the layers of shifting imperative expressions when examined from our own point of perspective, survival really is the one-size-fits-all unification theory concerning progressive physical development.
Regardless of the complexity of the formula cluttering up a chalkboard somewhere, it all comes down to the fact that whatever it is that exists, it must do what is possible to maintain that existence until it can no longer maintain it. And most of the time, that involves increasing complexity, layering and even assembly matrixing with the intent of extending the identity of the holon that provides that existential identity to all that combines to create that holon. That one fact concerning reality is responsible for all that ever comes into existence at all levels.
Originally posted by TimesUp
Math is the invention of man =) so that could be debated
Math is what man created to measure the building blocks of
the universe.
Originally posted by ButtUglyToad
Originally posted by NorEaster
Yes, there is one overarching reason for life - all life - within a reality confine like the one we inhabit. In fact, this specific reality confine was initiated for one and only one reason. The thing is that regardless of how very specific the reason for our own, or any reality confine, is, the primordial driver for all that exists and does anything whatsoever is raw survival, and even though it gets pretty difficult to recognize this within the layers of shifting imperative expressions when examined from our own point of perspective, survival really is the one-size-fits-all unification theory concerning progressive physical development.
Regardless of the complexity of the formula cluttering up a chalkboard somewhere, it all comes down to the fact that whatever it is that exists, it must do what is possible to maintain that existence until it can no longer maintain it. And most of the time, that involves increasing complexity, layering and even assembly matrixing with the intent of extending the identity of the holon that provides that existential identity to all that combines to create that holon. That one fact concerning reality is responsible for all that ever comes into existence at all levels.
That's the Complexity Theory, which will go to the exteme until it cannot maintain itself any longer, but the Simplicity Theory is the exact opposite. It maintains simplicity, thus, it can never kNot maintain itself.
Thus, Simplicity is Forever, while Complexity is but a fleeting moment.
Ribbit
Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by Manula
YES!
And the summary of THAT theory is "We just don't know ®".
edit on 26/2/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Manula
reply to post by Res Ipsa
Some people like pain and avoid love, is it wrong to them? To you, yes, but to them, is it wrong?
How can you be sure?