It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shorty
is about a freedom to express yourself
Originally posted by infinite
Originally posted by shorty
is about a freedom to express yourself
Does that mean racist groups can speak their poison in public?
thats the problem with anarchy...freedom without restrictions
[edit on 5-10-2004 by infinite]
Originally posted by shorty
Like i said controlled anarchy they could say there belifs but not say things racist i mean you could say you dont like black people but you couldn't offend them. I am not racist.
Like i said controlled anarchy they could say there belifs but not say things racist i mean you could say you dont like black people but you couldn't offend them. I am not racist.
That's not anarchy, that freedom of speech which we have now. Freedom of speech is one the basic principles behind Democracy. Anarchism just isn't a practical political idealogy. It sounds good on the surface but once you get into what it means then you see that it's chaos, panic and hell on earth.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
Originally posted by shorty
Like i said controlled anarchy they could say there belifs but not say things racist i mean you could say you dont like black people but you couldn't offend them. I am not racist.
That's not anarchy, that freedom of speech which we have now. Freedom of speech is one the basic principles behind Democracy. Anarchism just isn't a practical political idealogy. It sounds good on the surface but once you get into what it means then you see that it's chaos, panic and hell on earth.
Originally posted by shorty
Controlled anarchy would be alittle more than freedom of speech and we dont truly have freedom of speech.
Originally posted by shorty
Controlled anarchy would be diffrent it would be less strict than a democracy. Maybe England could be split into to half so to speak a democracy and the state of controlled anarchy controled by a domocracy at roots and all totally under control of the domocracy. Does that make any sense.
Originally posted by shorty
I understand what your saying. I am disagreeing it can be controlled. No it would not be a full state of anarchy because law would pin you down to a degree but it would be less strict than current law.
And im talking about CA not a complete state of anarchy.
[Edited on 5-10-2004 by shorty]
Originally posted by shorty
I understand what your saying. I am disagreeing it can be controlled. No it would not be a full state of anarchy because law would pin you down to a degree but it would be less strict than current law.
And im talking about CA not a complete state of anarchy.
Originally posted by shorty
So my defintion of CA or CE controlled anarchy would be a freedom to express feeling and belif with control and laws IMHO = controlled anarchy. Its controlled expression
Sky News
"No self-respecting small businessman with a brain in the right place would ever employ a lady of child-bearing age," said Godfrey Bloom, a UK Independence Party MEP.
Mr Bloom, an investment fund manager from York, was speaking on his first day in Strasbourg - after being given a place on the Women's Rights Committee.
He said he wanted to deal with women's issues because "I just don't think they clean behind the fridge enough".
Later, Mr Bloom went on television to expand on his views on women's rights, saying: "The more women's rights you have, it's actually a bar to their employment.
He added: "That isn't politically incorrect, is it? But it's a fact of life. I know, because I am a businessman."
Originally posted by kegs
UKIP has many members with links to the BNP. You might want to check this out:
www.corbett-euro.demon.co.uk...
Many members of the BNP have become UKIP members, and members of UKIP have left and joined the BNP.
Also the current chairman of UKIP's branch in South Thanet, Martyn Heale, was previously a branch organiser and council candidate for the National Front.
(As reported in Private Eye)
UKIP is unfortunately attracting the extreme right as they see it as a respectable face to hide behind, and a viable vehicle for their twisted beliefs.
Also, they're not too good with Women.....