It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Child porn needs to stop being used as an excuse to censor the Internet

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 09:37 AM
link   
I am tired of the psychopathic, geriatric fascists in the American government and media industry, who are desperate to censor and control the Internet, continuing to use the canard of child pornography as their excuse and rationale.

Apart from anything else, anyone with a brain knows what a terrible excuse it is. Using children as an emotional means of gaining political leverage, is exactly the sort of tactic that Hitler would have advocated. They're using this not only because it's one excuse that can be guaranteed not to fail among the idiotic majority, but also because they know that they don't have any other excuse that the majority of people will accept. They have to use the most hysteria-generating rationale for it that they can find.

I do not care about child porn; and I say that as someone who has an uncle who is a convicted paedophile. Child porn is something that is going to happen, irrespective of anyone's attempt to police it. Do I think it is sick? Yes, I do. Do I think they can stop it by binding up the Internet? No, I don't. All they are going to do, is prevent us from using the Internet for any other purpose, and that is what they really want.

It is purely about control. Giuliani, Bernanke, and the other monsters in American politics do not care for one moment about keeping children safe. What they do care about, on the other hand, is you being able to do literally anything, anywhere, any time, which does not involve their consent. They want to own your soul, literally; and they want to control every single thing you can or cannot do, no matter how small, insignificant, or minor.

It isn't about keeping anyone safe. It isn't about protecting anyone. It is purely and simply because they are psychopaths who want to rule everyone else in existence that they possibly can.
edit on 25-2-2012 by petrus4 because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 09:41 AM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 09:44 AM
link   
reply to post by petrus4
 


while I feel empathic towards the emotions that drive your OP, please note: this is nothing new. Way back in 1995 I already made this an issue in local media, stating that the "protect our children"-argument was going to be abused in order to get control over the internet.
curious details: in the documents that were produced as a result of a debate over here, among politicians who violated our legislation by forcing ISPs to block IP-numbers on DNS-level, it is clearly stated that these politicians know that real predators, real pedosexuals aren't active on the web or the others spaces of the internet that are populated by consumers. They are active in the dark rooms of the internet, the ones that can't be controlled.
This is a clear proof of the fact that it is a scam, a lie to lure the population into acceptance of control.

but then again,what's new? Isn't it one of governments jobs to make sure nothing hinders the stream of money, going from the consumer to the corporation? and what did we make of the web? that's right, the biggest and most stupid shopping mall for morons interested in trowing birds



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 09:45 AM
link   
That is a general excuse that they always use.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 09:52 AM
link   
the only reason they try to patrol and regulate the internet so much is because, they themselves are addicts! They are the ones who are pedophiles, so they try to make laws against themselves. It's like misdirection.


They also know how sick they are and feel that if they outlawed their sickness that it will go away, rather than just confronting the problem.

also, pedophiles should be dealt with harder than they are. pedos should face the death penalty on each count, and the child should have the right to decide the pedos fate!



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 09:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by jennybee35

You are an awful person.


No, I'm not an awful person. I'm someone who doesn't want politicians, who really are awful people, to prevent me from using the Internet, and then use your offspring as an excuse.

If you want to breed, that's your perogative. I just don't want your reproduction to restrict my Internet use; especially given that I have made the decision not to reproduce myself.

I've seen a lot of women who think that a person is the personification of evil if they are in any way, remotely critical of the idea that said women should simply be able to breed, as many times as desired, irrespective of the potential consequences.

The point is that politicians manipulate the emotions of people like you, in order to remove the freedom of everyone else. Judging by what you've already written, I will take a wild stab in the dark here, and assume that you're the sort of person who would probably accept their rationale without question, as well.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 09:59 AM
link   
reply to post by petrus4
 


I couldn't agree more. Child porn is such a sensitive topic, probably more sensitive than racism, and can be/ is used to push through the most anti-human rights bills known to man (bills passed in the name of fighting terrorism aside). This is a video I watched yesterday that touches on exactly what you're talking about. It is in Canada, but honestly I see no difference in the two countries besides the population and how the laws are regulated.



Just run for Prime Minister already, Mercer!
edit on 25-2-2012 by theshepherd2 because: (no reason given)

edit on 25-2-2012 by theshepherd2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 10:06 AM
link   
I agree with the OP. It's a little pet peeve Rollye James has been pushing on her Radio SHow for as many years as I listened to it on the truck and I've always agreed. If they have something really rank and ugly to push on us, they just come up with a way to explain that it's 'For the children..." and everyone falls in line for something they wouldn't have accepted otherwise.


My problem here is....WHAT IS THE POINT? Oh I get the Children are the excuse ...but why buy it? For years in the 1990's it was AOL in the member chat area where Porn of all kinds could be had for the taking. All the child porn a person could need or want. It made the member only side of their chat system downright impossible to use for much else. Did anyone bust AOL? Not that I ever saw.....

Now we have Deep Web. Pass every law imaginable to give the world tyranny in the name of the Children and nothing will change THERE. Of all the crap people THINK they've seen on the open web, it's nothing. Absolutely nothing compared to Deep Web...and gee.I don't see the politicians crying for that.

So indeed... when I hear something explained as being 'For the children...' my instinct is to ask how we're being screwed and do I get a chance to vote against the person or thing using that reasoning?



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 10:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
 


exactly, these laws have nothing to do with Childs protection, as the place where that is really a problem is the deep web.

These laws wont touch .onion sites at all, and that is where the problems are.

, this is about Copy right enforcement not the safety of children.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 10:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by theclutch
the only reason they try to patrol and regulate the internet so much is because, they themselves are addicts! They are the ones who are pedophiles, so they try to make laws against themselves. It's like misdirection.


They also know how sick they are and feel that if they outlawed their sickness that it will go away, rather than just confronting the problem.

also, pedophiles should be dealt with harder than they are. pedos should face the death penalty on each count, and the child should have the right to decide the pedos fate!


I just wanted to repeat the above statement in its totality and I second the motion.

Many important people are involved in a deep underground pedophile ring. There is more than enough evidence to back this up. The fact that they are going overboard about regulating it and screaming "save the children" makes it look as though they are staunchly against it, but in reality, they are involved.

Regarding the thread topic, I don't think it should be cause the entire internet to be more tightly regulated. It certainly is being used as an excuse though. Because of these child porn sites, they are able to catch many people and get the evidence they need in order to prosecute. They simply need to start hiring more officials to combat this. Since they aren't doing this, it speaks volumes about them not wanting to put a stop to all pedophile activities. Think of it this way, If the red phone rang at headquarters every time somone logged into a child sex site like it does here whenever chemtrails are mentioned causing debunkers to come running, they would be arresting and prosecuting many more people.

Then the real problem: The smart ones have their connections and aren't going to be stupid enough to go online and get caught. These are the ones that need to be sought out and arrested. The river runs so deep though and the powerful sickos protect their own.



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 10:41 AM
link   
Maybe they can block roads, after all they are used to transport exploited children



posted on Feb, 25 2012 @ 11:38 AM
link   
reply to post by theclutch
 


excuse me but i find your argument rubbish. the reason why "they" use "child porn" to try to control the internet has nothing to do with "them" being "addicted" themselves.

here's a mechanism at play that is commonly known and pretty easy to detect. it's called "moral panic" and it goes like this:
-if you can't control in a direct way, by force or dominance, you need a call to the public
-in creating moral panic you manipulate that public's thinking in such a way that eventually you'll be invited by that audience to take action.

take for example the criminalization of cannabis in the US.
as there was not a single soul - except an asshole who understood he could gain personal professional benefits, his name was Anslinger - that moron started to create stories that were swallowed by mainstream media (they know how to make a buck) and that planted false associations.

I'm not a fan of the new son of god annex bbc sports journalist also known as Icke, but in this context one of his statements sounds familiar: create a problem and make sure you'll be invited to come up with a solution.



new topics

top topics



 
5

log in

join