It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Revolution9
reply to post by TheMindWar
Let's get this into perspective! Mr Tappin is a businessman who tried to sell batteries for IRANIAN MISSILES.
In other words, he tried to make money out of business that would millitarily empower a great enemy of the west.
He should count his lucky stars. In former years he might have been hanged for treason.
They are using him as an example to deter other businessmen from treasonous acts of making money by weakening us and strengthening our enemies. Remember the case of Mark Thatcher et al?
Business must engage in moral pratices and not endanger one's nation and the nations of one's allies.
Mr Tappin may have committed an act that would have endangered many many millions of people! Let us remember that.
By all means keep the pressure on that he gets a fair deal from the U.S Courts, But we need to get to the bottom of this issue. A clear message needs to go out to all businessmen not to play the whore. You cannot be allowed to put your own nation is such danger for a few bucks!
Good post. Thank you.
edit on 25-2-2012 by Revolution9 because: spellingedit on 25-2-2012 by Revolution9 because: spellingedit on 25-2-2012 by Revolution9 because: more spelling
Originally posted by n00bUK
Conspiracy in its self how a man of his status would sell Iran anything in this climate, let alone for a tiny fortune of £500. I think the rabbit hole goes very deep on this incident, I just don't know where to start looking.
We're not allowed to extradite a known, actual, real terrorist because of EU legislation of human rights, but we can extradite a well respected citizen to america for something, which seems he was set up for.
Stinks to the high heavens and I'm sick to death of my country been a walking mat, given any of the situations been the other way round, he wouldnt of been extradited+ to England from America and the terrorist would of been sent here from any other country on the globe.
Makes me sick how our politicians just back down, grow a fkin back bone for the sake of our people, not politicians 5,000 miles away - just another perfect example, of many, that shows how our people have no voice and the last word is spoken by the politicians.
When we say no or yes - it should happen. Who shouldn't be given an illusion of choice when in all realness, we do not count.
In 2006, Robert Gibson, a British client, asked him to ship five industrial batteries at a cost of $25,000 from Texas to an automotive company in Amsterdam.bUnknown to Gibson, the vendor, Mercury Global Enterprises (MGE) of El Paso, was a front company set up by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency to entrap businessmen engaged in the illegal export of controlled technologies. Gibson was arrested that August when he went to inspect the batteries. He was accused of attempting to send them to Iran for use in Hawk air defence missiles. Gibson named Mr Tappin as a co-conspirator, said that they were to share the profits from the battery sales, and provided allegedly incriminating evidence. He was handed a two-year sentence.
Originally posted by n00bUK
reply to post by Revolution9
He didnt say, here Mr Ahmadinejad, heres £500 worth of batteries. . . He didnt sell the items direct, he owns a company that sold them to a sub contacted company which was Iranian.
Maybe America should start locking people up in their own country who finance terrorist to take down regimes? until this one sided system stops, I think America has 0 rights of taking our citizens. Its o.k for America to finance terrorist that are deemed a threat to many nations across the globe - in the name of democracy, but yet if the other way round - our citizens can be sent to America for trial?
Hmmmm. No.
America is a bully and its even worse that our politicians back down like lap dogs. Lucky they do because our nations citizens have nothing nice to say to this two sides 'friendship'
Originally posted by blupblup
Interesting overview here.
friends-extradited.org...
www.bbc.co.uk...
www.anorak.co.uk...
In 2006, Robert Gibson, a British client, asked him to ship five industrial batteries at a cost of $25,000 from Texas to an automotive company in Amsterdam.bUnknown to Gibson, the vendor, Mercury Global Enterprises (MGE) of El Paso, was a front company set up by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency to entrap businessmen engaged in the illegal export of controlled technologies. Gibson was arrested that August when he went to inspect the batteries. He was accused of attempting to send them to Iran for use in Hawk air defence missiles. Gibson named Mr Tappin as a co-conspirator, said that they were to share the profits from the battery sales, and provided allegedly incriminating evidence. He was handed a two-year sentence.
Originally posted by biggilo
reply to post by Revolution9
The issue is much more about the extradition treaty, sure MAYBE Mr Tappin done something wrong but he has been sent to a foreign country with a dubious judicial system with no rights to appeal the extradition.
This is not what the UK is supposed to stand for, it is fact that the USA is harbouring convicted terrorists and refuse to extradite them to us, what is the excuse for this?