It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Oath Keepers: We Can Legally File Charges Against Obama

page: 3
27
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 01:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 



Topping that list:
1. Convicted felon and Chicago real estate developer Tony Rezko’s purchase of land adjacent to Obama’s house in Hyde Park, IL. In 2006, Rezko sold a 10 foot strip of his property to Obama for $104,500, rendering the remainder of Rezko’s $625,000 investment too small to be developed and, for all intensive purposes, worthless.


The number one item on the list of reasons to impeach Obama is that he bought a 10-foot strip of land from his neighbor in a mutual agreement and that ruined his neighbor's land "for all intensive purposes"? What were those "intensive purposes"?


What?


And you expect this to be taken seriously? "Oh, impeach Obama! He bought land"!!!


I hear he bought a used car from Meryl Streep and j-walked once, too. IMPEACH!!!

So silly! :shk:
edit on 2/25/2012 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)


Obama ruined a ten foot stretch of land; "Arrest him"

Clinton gets a blow job! "impeach him!"

Bush commits the US to war based on fake intelligence and gross manipulation; "Re Elect him!"



Oath keepers should change their names to Bird Brains or Corruptible Minds




posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 05:45 AM
link   
reply to post by mastahunta
 



Oath keepers should change their names to Bird Brains or Corruptible Minds .


It could be that they're just dumb but seriously, after all I've seen, I'm honestly starting to think it's some kind of disinfo tactic or reverse psyop done on purpose. The whole Birther thing also, true or not.

Everyone talking about his birth certificate all the time, but anyone with half a brain knows even if there was any truth to the claim, NOBODY is going to do anything about it. Not after he's already been elected. It's just not gonna happen people It's a done deal. Sheriffs pressing charges against the president for a strip of land? Come on people, not gonna happen. Maybe it SHOULD happen, but it's not going to. SS wouldn't let them within 10 miles of Obama.

The only reason people are still bringing it up, could be to simply distract everyone from other issues. Of all the issues people could be complaining about when it comes to Obama, like wanting to deploy drones over US soil for example? What would we need that for unless we're the enemy BTW?

All the BC thing does is make anti-Obama people look crazy and racist. And I'm starting to think it's PURPOSELY set up to do just that. It's easier to win an election when all the people that are against you look INSANE. It would explain a lot.

For example it would explain why Obama gave everyone so much trouble over his BC to begin with, to make it look like it didn't exist, then make it look like it was faked when it released and on and on. Now let's make it look like anti-Obama people are crazy and think they can arrest the President. HAHAHA, big laugh right?

All the while, actual debate goes out the window. Obama wins another election.



posted on Feb, 27 2012 @ 11:50 PM
link   
reply to post by newcovenant
 


There is controversy here, over whether a President can be arrested, and if he can, whether he can be prosecuted. Some say he can't, some say he can, some say he can only after being impeached. It's a real gray area with no clear answer. Maybe Obama will help us shed some clarity on the subject, one can only hope.



posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 12:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by TrueAmerican


4. Obama’s refusal to release his long form birth certificate which would show conclusively that he is a dual citizen and therefore not constitutionally eligible to serve as President. Obama’s college records, which have also not been released, would also contain information regarding his dual citizenship status.



If someone's parent (either one) is an American citizen their offspring is a natural born citizen and capable of running for president no matter where they were born, right?



posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 02:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by ILikeStars

Originally posted by TrueAmerican


4. Obama’s refusal to release his long form birth certificate which would show conclusively that he is a dual citizen and therefore not constitutionally eligible to serve as President. Obama’s college records, which have also not been released, would also contain information regarding his dual citizenship status.



If someone's parent (either one) is an American citizen their offspring is a natural born citizen and capable of running for president no matter where they were born, right?




Wrong. Natural Born Citizen is not the same as American Citizen, and you can be born on American Soil with an American parent and NOT be a Natural Born Citizen. It was more or less a clause added to prevent a foreign power from gaining control of the U.S. Say Nobleman X takes an American wife, has a child on US soil, and then uses that child to gain control of the US through the office of the presidency. This was a real fear. If Obama has dual citizenship (which is likely even though he was born on Hawaii), he may not qualify to be a Natural Born Citizen. This is why Obama releases proof of his birthplace, and not anything that would prove his Natural Born status.



new topics

top topics
 
27
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join