When can Zer0 + Zer0 = 0ne?

reply to post by ButtUglyToad


0 + 0 = 1

How you ever wondered what plus really is in the equation? Is it something to consider as a physical and existing power of some sort?

The only thing that can be 1 is the + sign. You have three items 0, 0, and + before the =

Only the power of + can be 1. The = sign represents a process.

Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to post by ButtUglyToad

 

So the point of this thread is to show how stupid people are?

To show them they have been bamboozled, just as you have and just as eYe have.

It's amazing what the real truth is and just how impossible it will be to get many of you to realize it. It's bad enough trying to get you to see the truth about the Universe, but Life is a whole different ballgame.

The perfection is unbelievable!

Ribbit

Originally posted by ImaFungi
reply to post by ButtUglyToad

 

"As to vastness, while vast, it isn't as vast as one might think or imagine, but that is always subject to change over time."

well i consider a state vast, i consider a country vast, i consider the grand canyon and oceans vast, i consider the distance between planets in solar system vast, i consider distance between stars vast, in one galaxy, i consider distance between 2 galaxies vast, how many galaxies are there... uber snippin vast....

do you think the god of this universe was the first? does god have a trademark on energy and time or is creation the oldest trick in the book?

As of now, eYe don't have a clue how old She is, since all input is tainted, thus, cannot be trusted. But based on this Matrix and all input, We can't even see 1% of Her magnificent beauty. But all input is tainted sew it would be impossible to get a fix on anything.

As to first, eYe think this song says it:



She's All there is but She's also All you'd ever want.

Have you ever wondered how WE the Souls communicate with each other in Soulform, and how dew WE get about? Or dew WE ever move about in the physical?

Sew if WE have a internal communication system, is it holographic? And if it is, just how good is it? Does it feel real? Is there any difference between Real & Memorex?

Ribbit

Originally posted by DuShane
Let's put it into energy forms perhaps? Maybe one 0 is Yin and the other 0 is Yang.
Both of them put together ((Interaction)) would create something?

( ' / .)

Ever wonder how a Anti-Positronic Brain could werk correctly without a Anti-Negatronic side to it as well?

Wouldn't you need both sides to create a perfect ongoing flow between the two, sew they werk continuously and harmoniously?

Ever wonder what God's/Source's Brain looks like?

Ribbit

Everything mathematically based is technically "wrong" or "misled." After all, we arrive at solutions not because they are right, but because they are more correct than the other hypotheses we have proposed - in other words, everything we know has been derived and is a product of the elimination method. Who knows? One day we might come across something which will prove the fundamental bases of all intellectual advance to be wrong. Just a thought.
Bless,
N0stalgia

Well, of course, if you add up two zeros, you only have one big nothing. You can add up a billion zeros and they'll still equal a single nothing. That's the fun of multi-dimensionality, although it highlights a limitation of mathematics to describe the real world.

For instance, if you take a regular Euclidean type line, infinite as far as anyone knows...



... and put a point in it, what do you get? Two half infinities? Two whole infinities?

.

It would be nice if there was a better way to represent things than that.

Originally posted by Blue Shift
Well, of course, if you add up two zeros, you only have one big nothing. You can add up a billion zeros and they'll still equal a single nothing. That's the fun of multi-dimensionality, although it highlights a limitation of mathematics to describe the real world.

For instance, if you take a regular Euclidean type line, infinite as far as anyone knows...



... and put a point in it, what do you get? Two half infinities? Two whole infinities?

.

It would be nice if there was a better way to represent things than that.

That's one of the beauties of Infinite & finite, they can be divided by any given number greater than one and still equal themselves.

It's that infinite fact that helps to explain the contradictory nature of the original equation in the OP.

Ribbit

Originally posted by Blue Shift
For instance, if you take a regular Euclidean type line, infinite as far as anyone knows...



... and put a point in it, what do you get? Two half infinities? Two whole infinities?

.

The line already implies infinity, the point defines 0. From there you'd go towards infinity in the positive direction or the negative direction (right/left). Adding more points would define other numbers (in between 0 and infinity).

There's no such thing as half or whole infinities. Infinity's like 0, but an infinite distance from 0 and insided out.