It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While hardly discussed broadly in the mainstream media, the top news of the past 24 hours without doubt is that in addition to losing its fiscal sovereignty, and numerous other things, the Greek population is about to lose its gold in a perfectly legitimate fashion, following amendments to the country's constitution by unelected banker technocrats, who will make it legal for Greek creditors - read insolvent European banks - to plunder the Greek gold which at last check amounts to 111.6 tonnes according to the WGC. And so we come full circle to what the ultimate goal of banker intervention in the European periphery is - nothing short of full gold confiscation.
That article is mostly speculation, I don't think it's possible for such a constitutional amendment in Portugal, and much less likely the confiscation of personal property without a legal backing.
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
According to the article, it isn't just Greece, it is also Portugal, Italy, Ireland, and Spain. The article also mentions constitutional amendments in those countries to confiscate people's personal gold.
Don't forget that there are many people that participated in the Carnation Revolution, and, unlike most of the newer generations that only know Facebook and YouTube, they know how to organize things.
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
My step-father is from Portugal and I couldn't imagine he and his countrymen allowing anybody to take their hard-earned riches.
Some years ago we had a case of a politician that sold his voting intentions because of some cheesy (in the real meaning of the word, as it was really related to some cheese factory) business. I don't remember if he was subject to some punishment by his party, but everybody knew what had happened and his career was not the same from that moment on.
However, don't underestimate the bankster's desire and their ability to buy off politicians.
To change our constitution the parliament needs a 2/3 majority, and although the two bigger parties make more than that, they are on opposite sides. The party with most seats could have enough votes if they could get all other parties to follow their voting intentions, but most smaller parties are also on the other side of the political fence.
Look what is happening in the US, and how our constitution is slowly being thwarted, with full backing from the Supreme Court.
Then there's hope.
A constitution in any nation is only as powerful as the people it protects, and the politicians who are supposed to protect it.