It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To say that this source is a little biased would be somewhat of an understatement, to say the least. As "musicjunkie" clearly pointed out, one can just as easily find the exact opposite opinion from other sources.
Originally posted by Flatfish
reply to post by xuenchen
Anytime that someone attempts to develop new technologies, there will be failures. As we all know, the Wright brothers didn't succeed on their first attempt, or their second or third for that matter. Furthermore, even oil drilling has had it's fair share of failures only to be improved over time as new technologies in the field arose. This is true for all new and emerging technologies and we should not abandon ship just because some things don't work out exactly as planned.
We should be exploring every avenue that will assist us in achieving sustainable energy independence. We have overcome emerging technology pitfalls in the past and we will do so again in the future. All I'm saying is, just don't be so quick to write something off as a failure just because it didn't fly on the first attempt. You know the old saying; "If as first you don't succeed, try, try again."
Germany invested gargantuan amounts of money in green energy, doling out more than 130 billion in subsidies to install solar systems and spends an additional 10 billion per year subsidizing existing solar installations. Yet after all of this capital expenditure, Germany has little to show in terms of reducing green house gasses and helping the country's power needs.
Despite massive investment, solar power accounts for approximately three percent of Germany’s total energy...When the sun shines! To add insult to injury, Germans also pay the second highest price for electricity in the developed world, due mainly to the fact that they are heavily subsidizing green energy by adding the cost to everyone's utility bills.
Originally posted by Deetermined
"Germany says solar energy is path to bankruptcy, yet Obama doubles US down on it"
Read more: www.irishcentral.com... xzz1nKH11Sy8
Germany invested gargantuan amounts of money in green energy, doling out more than 130 billion in subsidies to install solar systems and spends an additional 10 billion per year subsidizing existing solar installations. Yet after all of this capital expenditure, Germany has little to show in terms of reducing green house gasses and helping the country's power needs.
Despite massive investment, solar power accounts for approximately three percent of Germany’s total energy...When the sun shines! To add insult to injury, Germans also pay the second highest price for electricity in the developed world, due mainly to the fact that they are heavily subsidizing green energy by adding the cost to everyone's utility bills.
President Obama relied on the false pretense that subsidizing “green energy” as other nations such as Spain, Germany and Japan did would result in “good, high-wage jobs” when in actuality, nations such as Spain, Italy, Denmark, Germany and the U.K. have struggled with job destruction, higher energy costs and loss of taxpayer dollars as a result of pursuing such policies.
The Blue Green Alliance is a nonprofit, 501(c) (4) organization dedicated to expanding the number and quality of jobs in the green economy.
We combine the strength of our 14 million members and supporters to form a powerful voice for building a stronger, more efficient and more competitive American economy. We are working to create good jobs, improve health and safety at work, protect the health of the public and the environment, reduce our nation's dependence on foreign oil, and ensure America's leadership in the global economy.
Blue Green Alliance Board of Directors
Leo W. Gerard, International President, United Steelworkers,Co-chair
Michael Brune, Executive Director, Sierra Club, Co-chair
Larry Cohen, President, Communications Workers of America
Peter Lehner, Executive Director, Natural Resources Defense Council
Gerald Hudson, International Executive Vice President, Service Employees International Union
Joseph T. Hansen, International President, United Food and Commercial Workers
D. Michael Langford, National President, Utility Workers Union of America
Larry Schweiger, President and CEO, National Wildlife Federation
Lawrence J. Hanley, International President, Amalgamated Transit Union
Kevin Knobloch, President, Union of Concerned Scientists
Loretta Johnson, Secretary-Treasurer, American Federation of Teachers
Bob King, President, United Auto Workers
Phil Angelides, President, Riverview Capital Investment
Robert Borosage, Director, Campaign for America's Future
Mindy S. Lubber, JD, MBA, President, CERES
President Barack Obama’s administration is buying fewer hybrid and electric cars and more vehicles that can consume both ethanol and gasoline to meet 2015 environmental goals, favoring older technology over new.
Obama gave speeches across the U.S. last year touting his twin goals of buying only alternative-fuel vehicles for the U.S. fleet by 2015 and getting 1 million electric vehicles on the country’s roads by that year.
That’s looking more difficult as the federal government learns the same lesson that U.S. car consumers have already figured out: it is tough being green. Rather than leading the way, the government has discovered that the high cost of hybrids and electric cars and their lack of availability often mean it makes more sense to buy cars with fuel-efficient conventional engines.