It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by crappiekat
reply to post by Plugin
I'm not affiated with the dnr. Nor do I have any degree in fish biology. What I do know is what I have been taught about envasis species, This species will eat everything. There will be nothing left for our sport fish that feed on the same food.
My husband and I live to fish. We try to be as careful as we can to keep our waters safe. We always wash our boat before and after we leave a body of water and go to another. We follow dnr rules. And we are CPR only.
We love the sport.
That is why I'm concerned about this money. Is it really for the fishery or is this money being filted through the system for other reasons. There are people who think this whole asain carp thing is nothing. I really don't know for sure. But believe me I am watching this story.
Originally posted by reaxi0n
reply to post by Plugin
Lmao yes shotguns
I don't know. They seem pretty tricky to kill. A shotgun seems like the best bet
Originally posted by RadioactiveRob
Originally posted by reaxi0n
reply to post by Plugin
Lmao yes shotguns
I don't know. They seem pretty tricky to kill. A shotgun seems like the best bet
Yes, not only will the shotgun effort be futile and unsuccessful but you'll also pollute the river with lead and heavy metals, definitely the best bet.
There's nothing that can be done.
Originally posted by reaxi0n
Originally posted by RadioactiveRob
Originally posted by reaxi0n
reply to post by Plugin
Lmao yes shotguns
I don't know. They seem pretty tricky to kill. A shotgun seems like the best bet
Yes, not only will the shotgun effort be futile and unsuccessful but you'll also pollute the river with lead and heavy metals, definitely the best bet.
There's nothing that can be done.
The bill says it only allows a certain type of ammunition, but I'm not sure what it is. So you may be wrong on that one.
I also think you'd be wrong on a shotgun not killing anything. That's illogical.
Originally posted by RadioactiveRob
Originally posted by reaxi0n
Originally posted by RadioactiveRob
Originally posted by reaxi0n
reply to post by Plugin
Lmao yes shotguns
I don't know. They seem pretty tricky to kill. A shotgun seems like the best bet
Yes, not only will the shotgun effort be futile and unsuccessful but you'll also pollute the river with lead and heavy metals, definitely the best bet.
There's nothing that can be done.
The bill says it only allows a certain type of ammunition, but I'm not sure what it is. So you may be wrong on that one.
I also think you'd be wrong on a shotgun not killing anything. That's illogical.
I'm not trying to put you on the defense or anything but I don't know how successful they'll be trying to kill every asian carp in the river with shotguns, sounds kinda like the war on terror the endless war you can never win.
Originally posted by RadioactiveRob
Are they spending the 50m on shotguns and shells? What exactly costs 50 million?