posted on Feb, 24 2012 @ 01:14 AM
I'm more readily available and open to the possibility of the big hairy guy. Overall evidence, I think, is pretty close to convincing.
Though still on the fence, I'm leaning further toward belief in the bug guy.
This photo, however, seems too convenient, too clear, and too ambiguous.
It does not appear that this was shot in IR like most trail cams do (though I could be wrong on trail cam operation).
It appears shot with a regular camera, with a regular flash.
This would indicate to me that this shot is fishy.
Guy in a suit? for a staged photo, why would you need a suit? You could get away with an un-fired clay bust sculpture with meticulous groups of
natural hair implanted into the soft clay.
It wouldn't even have to be all that accurate a sculpture either so long as the general outline of a morphology people want to see is there.
it'd be nice were this real, but, I've holding back in reserve.
Cool post. Thank you.