Looks like the top of a balding man's head.

Need more pics.

looks like to guy at the pool the other day

Great pic, though, of course he had to have been facing the other direction, right?

to both of the previous posters.

As for more pictures, this is the only one released. It has been cropped as the person said there identifying features in the background.

Pred...

When I saw that image,the first thing that came to mind was a mango tree.




And a grey haired old bigfoot eating mangoes.

Where was this taken?

But if that is what it is,it is flowering with no fruit.

Best Bigfoot photo ever, obviously, but I had to do it.

X.

thats either bigfoot.. or just some italian guy

but it's scary .. thats for sure



ill bet he stinks somethin awful too

Well, its a really interesting picture.
Good hair effects. I like how its quite natural in its flow. If its a hoax, I must give props to the person's work for convincing hair.

But ok..so what do we have. We have a potential humanoid back with hair...no reference for size, or any distinctive features that can be potentially debunked...so, like a film of a UFO being little more than a wiggly light in the sky..it is pretty much nothing of great note in the grand scheme of things.

I know like 10 people hairier than this guy.

I can't believe I'm commenting in a big foot thread on a major conspiracy site. No wonder my cell phone stopped ringing years ago.

Of all the conspiracies out there, I think this is the one I can never believe in no matter how much evidence I see.

Incidentally
we could be seeing the southern end of a northbound dog.

Originally posted by JibbyJedi
I know like 10 people hairier than this guy.

I can't believe I'm commenting in a big foot thread on a major conspiracy site. No wonder my cell phone stopped ringing years ago.

Of all the conspiracies out there, I think this is the one I can never believe in no matter how much evidence I see.

Why? If there is bigfoot out there somewhere, its little more than yet another primate..just obviously not as populated as the average chimp...keeps away from noise and whatnot.

But, on the other hand, I would think with the interest throughout the years, some pretty clear footage would have been captured by now...or bones or something.

I don't dismiss it, just not overly interested in it...ok, good..we have a gorilla variation in the north...not that earth shattering really.

Text

When I set up my critter cam for night shots I always set it to take three pictures with a delay of ten seconds between shots. The camera is set off with a combination of motion and infared heat sensing. The target always looks in the direction of the flash from the first picture so I get a good mug shot in the second frame and the critter most often turns and walks away by the time the third picture is taken twenty seconds after the sequence begins.

The features of my critter cam are common to all the devices I have seen and I would expect the person who set out their critter cam is familiar with what I have described.

Lets see a sequence including one of the animal looking at the source of the flash.