The mass resignations of more than 100 banking and government officials is seen by many as the beginning of the end for the New World Order. If you
haven't seen the growing list of this recent exodus, you can check it out here:
Among one of the more talked and significant resignations is that of Robert Zoellick--the head of the World Bank. In this thread, I'd like to focus
on his position to prove a point: The New World Order isn't really throwing in the towel. And while we don't know where these "mass resignations"
are taking us, I think an important clue as to which way the wind is blowing will lie in which person assumes Zoellick's position.
What does the world bank do? It was created during the Bretton Wood's conference, along with the International Monetary Fund. Here's a snippet of
The World Bank is an international institution that was developed to assist developing countries by giving loans and offering financial
advisement. The goal of the World Bank is to assist in plans for economic development with the goal of improved living conditions for the citizens of
these countries. Created in 1944, the World Bank is one of two major financial institutions that resulted from the Bretton Woods Conference (the other
being the International Monetary Fund). The World Bank currently has 185 member countries that comprise its ownership.
That all sounds very rosy, but the truth is that the World Bank is corrupt, as most of you know. In 2010, a symposium was held to find ways for the
World Bank to reform itself and combat corruption. At the same time, the bankers were busy contradicting themselves by announcing big loans to the
very countries that have been stealing both institutions (including the IMF) blind. In other words, the World Banks finance corrupt nations. This is
not its only fault, of course, but is just one example of its lack of integrity.
So, here's Zoellick waving goodbye:
Now to the point: As soon as Zoellick stepped down, many, many countries and individuals began jockeying for the position. The United States, of
course, wanted to appoint one of its members to the position right away and US treasury secretary Timothy Geithner quickly announced that the US
government would put forward a candidate in the coming weeks. The United States' claim to this position is through a "gentleman's agreement" of the
global elite whereby Europe could put one of its own in the IMF and the US maintains control of the World Bank. That's the little deal they've had
But not so fast! It seems the rest of the world is calling this convenient arrangement into question, especially after the arrest of Frenchman
Dominique Straus-Kahn, whom you may remember was arrested last year on rape charges from allegations a maid made in a New York City hotel. The
charges were eventually dropped--but Straus-Kahn was just arrested again this week for allegations he secured prostitutes for orgies in France and the
US. Many people in many circles have called these arrests a conspiracy----pretty convenient given the timing--since Straus-Kahn was slated for the
IMF position. Smelling a fish here yet?
She is conveniently stepping down as Secretary of State and many say she is eyeing the position of Head of World Bank.
"You can be sure the US will probably do its best to ensure that it remains in control at the World Bank for as long as possible, and chooses who
runs the institution
Also note Larry Summers is breathing down Hillary's neck for the job.
Here's the rub: Recently, a group of International NGO's wrote an open letter to the governance board of the World bank, to "push for the selection
of the best candidate through an open, merit-based, transparent process, and to ensure that developing countries play a central role in the selection
process". Developing nations want a say---perhaps a nod in the direction of creating a fair and realistic banking sector free of the NWO.
Despite the disarray in the global banking industry, the World Bank and the IMF are still very powerful institutions. Watch carefully to see who wins
this round. It may very well tell us what direction we are headed in.
Here is the current list of candidates and their odds of scoring this position:
Larry Summers 4/11
Susan Rice 9/2
Hillary Clinton 9/2
Kemal Dervis 9/1
Tim Geithner 9/1
Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala 20/1
Trevor Manuel 20/1
Lula da Silva 20/1[ex/]
What are your thoughts? Were the Straus-Kahn arrests a set-up? Is Hillary going to get the job and carry the torch for the NWO? Or will the
developing nations win out and forge a new path for the world?
edit on 23-2-2012 by MRuss because: (no reason given)