It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
....
Originally posted by casenately
reply to post by Xcathdra
but then, they could not have signed, developed all sorts of nuclear technology and that would be that. They want the peaceful purposes for the energy. They probably would just say they want nukes if they wanted to make them. They aren't shy.
so the issue is they "might" violate the treaty by making weapons. When if they didn't sign, there would be no issue.
got it.
Originally posted by curedby432
reply to post by Xcathdra
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Actually Iran considers itself an Islamic Republic, not a Theocracy.
Erm, let's backtrack here. Yes, Iran is a theocracy. Ask any scholar.
An Islamic state is a state that has adopted Islam, specifically Sharia, as its foundations for political institutions, or laws, exclusively, and has implemented the Islamic ruling system khilafah (Arabic: خلافة), and is therefore a theocracy.
Source
edit on 25-2-2012 by curedby432 because: (no reason given)edit on 25-2-2012 by curedby432 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xcathdra
By refusing to allow access to declared sites, by enriching Uranium over 20% in addition to being able to enrich up to 80%, by building sites for their nuke program and not disclosing those locations to the IAEA etc etc etc.
Iran is in violation of their obligations, and those obligations specifically spell out dual purpose programs (nuke). In order to ensure the program is in compliance, we come back to the inspections and access. Iran does not have to be in physical possession of a nuclear bomb to be in violation of the treaty.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
.
..specifically spell out dual purpose programs (nuke).
Originally posted by casenately
reply to post by Xcathdra
Hamas Hezbollah and Iran.....3 separate entities.
to mix them up is like saying Iraq had anything to do with 9/11 although Sadam had a hatred of rebel groups like al-Qaida.
Both Hamas and Fatah are predominately Sunni Muslim, whereas Hezbollah has its roots in the Shia denomination of Islam
they are VERY different.
One recent e-mail highlighted the plight of Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani, who was arrested in October, 2009 for speaking out against changes to policies in the Iranian education system
In 2009, Nadarkhani discovered a recent change in Iranian educational policy that forced all students, including his children, to read from the Qur'an. After he heard about this change, he went to the school and protested, based on the fact that the Iranian constitution guarantees freedom to practice religion. His protest was reported to the police, who arrested him and placed him before a tribunal on October 12, 2009, on charges of protesting.[8][9]
Originally posted by casenately
they have a right to the same privacy that other member states have. They have not found any over 20% enriched uranium. There is no evidence they have violated anything.
Originally posted by casenately
The thing is they NEED evidence to make such a claim. If not we can invade Mexico right now. They have nuclear power and have private facilities that are classified by their government.
Originally posted by casenately
Perhaps they too have nukes.
Originally posted by casenately
reply to post by Soshh
no what I mean to say is don't make isht up. The people in question are not referring to the validity of the state of Israel, but ZIONISM. stop lying to us.
unless that is inconvenient to your war effort.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Perhaps they have a program that can make nukes?