Here's what French says:

"Damascus owes us an answer"; French Foreign Minister Juppe says France holds Syria responsible for Remi Ochlik death

Remi Ochlik is the French journalist that died yesterday under Syria's army bombing...

There is no doubt that the tone goes up between France and Syria...

S&F for something that we should follow closely, as Syria is playing a dangerous game here.

Originally posted by elevenaugust
Here's what French says:

"Damascus owes us an answer"; French Foreign Minister Juppe says France holds Syria responsible for Remi Ochlik death

Remi Ochlik is the French journalist that died yesterday under Syria's army bombing...

There is no doubt that the tone goes up between France and Syria...

The 2 journalists killed will open the Pandora Box
but what really happened .. were they really killed by the assad troops ?
the media is controlled and the ones owning the media can create any news to favor them

There has been some people with an agenda
the same ones that destroyed and killed many in the WTC with a controlled demolition
killing 2 more so they can benefit from their death .. they have done that a lot
its the best colateral damage they can get to boost their advantage on Syria

Its Debka...i wouldnt believe it. They have reported an imminent fly zone over Syria for the last 4 months and nothing has happened.

I cant see how this could possibly end well?

Shouldnt the Arab nations be handling this matter instead of once again western nations running to the rescue?

Russia and China need to start moving heavy military hardware into syria to block the NATO terrorists.

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Russia and China need to start moving heavy military hardware into syria to block the NATO terrorists.

...and then do what when NATO comes? Blast them to hell and hightwater? ......I doubt it.

-SAP-

Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Russia and China need to start moving heavy military hardware into syria to block the NATO terrorists.

Its impossible that they didnt think of that before
Is there any reasons for that ?

Maybe they wait for the US to move in
BEFORE THEY DO

Yeah it's debka but the elite wants to take out Syria before Iran... and they want to take out Iran before the US election... so time is running short.

So it might be true.

And yeah if Russia-China really wants to stop the whole thing, they need to put military hardware there...

Russia is basically the only one who can do so without being blamed because they've got a base in Tartus.

What will be a must watch is the aftermath of the Russian election... big riots across the country might paralyze Russia and be used as a ``perfect moment`` for NATO to strike Syria while Putin is stranded at home.

I imagine "Syria" is tacked onto a binder in a big office full of other binders labeled with other countries, and when the time comes they just go grab the binder, open to page 1, point to the first sentence, and repeat to themselves, heres what the book says to do.

Originally posted by Vitchilo
Yeah it's debka but the elite wants to take out Syria before Iran... and they want to take out Iran before the US election... so time is running short.

So it might be true.

Its the best strategy .. the WMD reasons dont work anymore
take out the little brother before the big one
and try make it so in a way that it will be legal to bomb the crap out of Syria (protect the civilians)
and after bomb the crap out of Iran for helping Syria

If Syria is attacked by the West, there is 50% chance of WW III happening.

What's amazing to me, is that honestly, Youtube, google, cellphones and Facebook, made all this possible.

And now WW3 can begin properly it seems, with everyone trying to liberate everyone else of their foes. Problem is there is a loose definition of foes being used everywhere, who's next?

Only takes a few dumb moves to loose a chess game.

ITs a civil war, we should not get involved. That said, I think we should get in there just for the sake of relieving political tensions. We go in there supporting the people against assad. Russia and China will be pissed, but rather than them being pissed at us for threatening intervention.
Also the possible coming change in leadership in Russia will not be the end of the support for Syria, the leader of the opposition has said that there is popular support for syria to be left alone, being an old ally. People also don't want western influence to spread anymore east. They didn't stop us in Libya because they thought we'd fail, and since we suceeded they think its more important to stop western influence spreading anymore where we might suceed.

The whole situation in the middle east is due to western influence anyway. I think change came too early for nations that weren't ready for it. They see how many freedoms we have and they want it. For those in power, of course they're going to fight back to keep their powerbase.

If people are going to fight back against a leader who is shelling them, to put it in internet terms, owning them. Why should we get involved. Arming the other side is only going to cause more bloodshed. We don't really know whats going on in there, al we have is onesided activities of the government fighting the opposition. Where are the news footage and media coverage of what the opposition is doing to the government. IF they're doing nothing wrong they will have no reason to shell them, even if you do go insane, you have n reason to randomly start shelling your wn citizens.