Grandpa Arrested for Holding Burglar at Gunpoint, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times


reply posted on 23-2-2012 @ 08:04 PM by ANNED


reply posted on 23-2-2012 @ 10:40 PM by defcon5
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

I just got through posting about this in the
Glendale Police shoot and Kill grandfather with granchild in arms thread.

But here you go:
Brandishing a Weapon
Assault and Aggravated Assault
Assault is defined as the intentional act of threatening to injure a person. Brandishing a weapon falls firmly under the definition of assault. If a firearm or other deadly weapon is used, the charge is elevated to aggravated assault, a felony in Texas. Even if you were acting in self-defense by brandishing a firearm, you could still be at risk of being convicted for aggravated assault.

Pulling a firearm on someone without firing it suggests that the gun was not necessary and that you did not fear for your life, because if you had you would have pulled the trigger. Fighting an aggravated assault charge with the self-defense doctrine can therefore be a difficult argument to make in court.

Also from above link:
The Burden of Proof for Self-Defense
In any criminal case, the prosecution's main goal is to show that a crime was committed. In this instance, the prosecution must simply show that a weapon was brandished, which qualifies as assault. Whenever a defendant chooses to argue self-defense in a case, the burden of proof falls on the defendant, not the prosecution.

This means that the defendant must prove that the need for self-defense justified the commission of assault. If the defendant cannot successfully argue that self-defense was necessary, s/he may be found guilty of assault or aggravated assault.

So if you pull it, you better be able to prove that you needed too, that you were in fear of imminent danger, and you better use it. If you don’t then you are warned that under law you can end up with worse charges then the person who you brandished the weapon at.

Oh, BTW…
The fact that the man was a Grandpa has ZERO bearing on the case, nor what he did. Its simply propaganda to pull at peoples heartstrings to sway public opinion on behalf the supporters of the defendant. I bet that Charles Manson is a “Grandpa” by now too.

As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.

edit on 2/23/2012 by defcon5 because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags