It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Gov. Robert F. McDonnell is backing off his unconditional support for a bill requiring women to have an ultrasound before an abortion, focusing new attention on one of the most controversial pieces of legislation in Virginia’s General Assembly this year.
Until this weekend, McDonnell (R) and his aides had said the governor would sign the measure if it made it to his desk. McDonnell, who strongly opposes abortion, will no longer make that commitment.
Many of the bill’s supporters were apparently unaware of how invasive the procedure could be, one of the officials added.
What happened to all the extreme right wing's indignant "government intrusion" claims concerning mandated health care? Not only are they extreme right but extreme hypocrites.
WASHINGTON -- The Virginia House of Delegates passed on Wednesday a revised version of a GOP-sponsored informed consent bill that would require women to undergo an ultrasound at least 24 hours before having an abortion. The new bill, which requires women to receive an external, transabdominal ultrasound rather than a more invasive transvaginal ultrasound, passed by a vote of 65-32.
The new bill, which requires women to receive an external, transabdominal ultrasound
Well in order to have an abortion you have to have a tube like object stuffed up you, same with a vaginal ultrasound. So people that cry invasive is a little bit much.
She has to lie there on the table while the tech unnecessarily searches her body for the thing that could be easily removed.
The whole purpose of these laws is to manipulate women - to appeal to their maternal instinct and convince them not to do what they have already decided (with their doctor) to do
But still, it's still BS since it's not the government business at all.
The first recorded evidence of induced abortion, is from the Egyptian Ebers Papyrus in 1550 BCE.[3] A Chinese record documents the number of royal concubines who had abortions in China between the years 515 and 500 BCE.[4] According to Chinese folklore, the legendary Emperor Shennong prescribed the use of mercury to induce abortions nearly 5000 years ago.[5] Many of the methods employed in early and primitive cultures were non-surgical. Physical activities like strenuous labor, climbing, paddling, weightlifting, or diving were a common technique. Others included the use of irritant leaves, fasting, bloodletting, pouring hot water onto the abdomen, and lying on a heated coconut shell.[6] In primitive cultures, techniques developed through observation, adaptation of obstetrical methods, and transculturation.[7] Archaeological discoveries indicate early surgical attempts at the extraction of a fetus; however, such methods are not believed to have been common, given the infrequency with which they are mentioned in ancient medical texts.[8]
Much of what is known about the methods and practice of abortion in Greek and Roman history comes from early classical texts. Abortion, as a gynecological procedure, was primarily the province of women who were either midwives or well-informed laypeople. In his Theaetetus, Plato mentions a midwife's ability to induce abortion in the early stages of pregnancy.[9][10] It is thought unlikely that abortion was punished in classical Greece.[11]
In Aristotle's view, abortion, if performed early, was not the killing of something human,[12][13] and Aristotle would permit abortion if the birth rate was too high, but only at a stage before life and sense had begun in the embryo.[14] Aristotle considered the embryo to gain a human soul at 40 days if male and 90 days if female; before that, it had vegetable and animal souls.