It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by absolutely
reply to post by Spiratio
truth is not one, so there is nothing to explain when it is about absolute objective fact (I get this yes; reality is fluid dimension and changing.. we can divise the most comprehensive understandings but there is always refined aspects overlooked which leave implications that are not known)
means are to relative senses which is to absolute freedom dimension rights so again nothing to say there but about absolute freedom right for all and any condition
what cant mean truth bc mean absolute one, would keep seeing one more forever (yes... a bias so one has to look at both perspectives and draw parralels this is where inverses come in rather than comparing opposites)
what mean truth bc dont believe one, would reach to see truth alive (here I'm not sure what your saying but I get an incline that you mean if one holds to one percieved "truth" they will not see absolute truth whilst alive because there are many truths which lead to only one truth that is incomprehensible logistically speaking)
Originally posted by Spiratio
reply to post by absolutely
I don't claim that negative love positive, and positive hate negative -- there are always variables... what is perceived as an evil action by one may be seen necessary for survival by another. The vice of that is to allow another to abuse oneself and loved ones out of "compassion" for the lost (evil soul)... which is actually another implementation of confused values... if every compassionate human being acted like a Buddha the world would be run by tyrants (and it already is) so what I'm saying is it would be a much worse place if people didn't stand up for what is good and harmless and oppose evil with equal force but inverse intent "righteousness".