posted on Feb, 23 2012 @ 03:09 PM
(I thought about this all day at work...was a long day..lol....this is all speculation on my part btw)
It won't be Ron Paul as VP.
It's going to be Rand Paul (VP) as Mitt Romney's running mate.
Quite frankly i think you guys are about to get played.
It makes sense though. Ron Paul can't endorse Mitt Romney because Romney doesn't share the same principles....but Paul's son can, and Ron Paul will
endorse his son....but even if he didn't endorse his own son...it wouldn't matter anyway....because it will be perceived that way regardless.
It's kinda like Ron Paul's stance on earmarks.....he supports them without supporting them.....
Romney and Paul are supposedly friends...and Ron paul simply doesn't go after Romney like he does the other candidates. I noticed it before in
earlier debates, but it was really apparent last night and I commented about this on the thread covering the debate as it ended.
But utlimately, what will this mean?
It means you will have both Ron and Rand paul speaking at the GOP convention....but in the end it's not going to matter. It's just to get votes for
the establishment republicans.
What do you guys think? Does this sound plausible or am i over thinking this?
(edited numerous times)
edit on 23-2-2012 by David9176 because: (no reason given)