Originally posted by satron
losing feed when Paul speaks

I am watching it on TV this time, but rarely had issues with CNN streams

Originally posted by ddaniel

Originally posted by eLPresidente

Originally posted by ddaniel
I wish Ron would focus more on everything he has done right over the years, not what others have done wrong.

The other candidates have to resort to personal attacks, because they can't run on their records.

Ron has the opportunity to take the high road, but doesn't seem to be taking it. Shame, because it would really set him apart.

edit on 22-2-2012 by ddaniel because: (no reason given)

He was asked a question about his recently released AD.

Everyone here should know that Ron Paul answers a question directly when he is asked.

I realize he was responding to an AD. I just wish he wasn't using negative attacks PERIOD, because I don't think it is necessary, or representative of his character.

Are you arguing that the facts in Ron's latest Santorum advertisement indeed not factual?

Have evidence for that? Not even Santorum could properly defend himself from Ron's points so isn't it nice to know that there is a presidential candidate on stage, telling the truth?


There is a big difference between telling the truth and negative attacks.



Ron Paul's CHARACTER is sound, people rarely ever challenge his moral character and his opponents certainly don't dare to question his moral character.

Santorum, is going to shut down
his chance at the nominee with all
his non sense..

WHY IS SANTORUM EVEN HERE?!

Can someone please send him the memo explaining to him that nobody wants to listen to him speak?!

Originally posted by TheAnswerTo1984
This is so obvious. Santorum takes the first question, mentions romney, romney responds, santorum responds to romney's response. Next question goes to Romney. Romney mentions Santorum... etc. etc. That's how you give the people you want to talk 3 or 4x more time than someone like... Ron Paul.

After watching all these debates, they are so manufactured, it's laughable. I bet they all go out after the debates and have drinks and laugh about their manufactured dog and pony show, amongst one another.

They belong to "the club", and we ain't members.

Oh wow, I had no idea there was a debate tonight. I just woke up from a nap like 5 minutes ago.

Looks like I didnt miss too much though. Santorum v Romney slugfest it seems.

Also, as another member pointed out, John King sucks as a moderator. After he got shot down and couldnt back himself up in one of the last debates, I lost all respect for him being a moderator at these debates.

There is such an air of silence in the room when Gingrich talks.

Paul said he do not like the idea
of good bailouts and bad...

ANY BAIL OUT IS BAD!!

DAMN RIGHT!!

My CNN stream has been solid throughout here in Nevada, just fyi... Oh and Santorum's putting on that annoyed look I knew was coming eventually. Shouldn't we be having a break soon? I'd love to see them switch up topics so we can talk about how Iran must be destroyed or something. Wooo break.

Originally posted by buni11687
Oh wow, I had no idea there was a debate tonight. I just woke up from a nap like 5 minutes ago.

I recommend going back to sleep. You're not missing much. You'll probably learn more from your dreams.

Santorum 10:20 min
Romney 7.00 min
Gingrich 5:34 min
Paul 5:28 min

First break 8:40pm east.

Heating up now ladies and gents..

Time is a little dis proportioned as always

Man, Romney has a great delivery. Paul has the best ideals. Pretty good debate so far... act II coming up.

Santorum tanking this debate. Newt, almost nowhere to be seen. (Even worse than Paul.)

Did anyone else see Pauls new nickname at the intro? "The delegate hunter"? Wtf is up with that? Yet another subliminal message? The debate so far is a real joke.

So what it's sounding like -

CNN TV feed is having technical issues, ONLY when Paul speaks?

And the internet feed has no technical issues.

The Paul demographic (younger, "progressive" usually, for lack of better descriptions) are likely the ones that would actually use the internet feed, whereas people on the fence or opposing Paul aren't getting to hear his message?

Hmm..

Next, they will speak about immigration. I was surprised to learn that the Libertarian position on immigration is there should prettymuch be no walls and employers should hire who ever they want. No "borders-language-culture" but I don't understand the difference of that and globalism.

great response by ron paul right before commercial break, endorsing the free market and putting the whole bailout debate in order, i.e. there are no good bailouts.

This moderator should be kicked in the balls. He is letting Santorum and Romney dominate the debate. CNN u fing SUCK.