It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well, evolution is an infinite process, there is no finite scale upon which we can measure our advancement, our idea of what is "advanced" is always going to be relative to something else.
We as humans think of ourselves as advanced, the most intelligent and so on. However I see things differently, I feel we are measuring advancement on our own terms with an obvious bias.
"Primitive" is also just a relative term. If you are judging our species based on our balance with the environment, then we are certainly quite primitive. If you are judging our species based on how long we've had electronic technology, we are extremely primitive, like little children learning to take their first steps. However if you are judging our species based on the technology we have when compared to the technology other Earth species have, we seem like super advanced geniuses. It's all relative, and dependant on how you decide to look at it.
What if we have become so primitive we are looking further and wider to compensate for weakness?
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by OwenGP185
Well, evolution is an infinite process, there is no finite scale upon which we can measure our advancement, our idea of what is "advanced" is always going to be relative to something else.
We as humans think of ourselves as advanced, the most intelligent and so on. However I see things differently, I feel we are measuring advancement on our own terms with an obvious bias.
"Primitive" is also just a relative term. If you are judging our species based on our balance with the environment, then we are certainly quite primitive. If you are judging our species based on how like we've had electronic technology, we are extremely primitive, like little children learning to take their first steps. However if you are judging our species based on the technology we have when compared to the technology other Earth species have, we seem like super advanced geniuses. It's all relative, and dependant on how you decide to look at it.
What if we have become so primitive we are looking further and wider to compensate for weakness?
Of course I can see what you are trying to say. And I would say that we aren't living in harmony with nature, not because we are primitive compared to other Earth species, but because we are extremely greedy and self serving compared to other Earth species.
According to a new DNA study, most humans have a little Neanderthal in them—at least 1 to 4 percent of a person's genetic makeup.
The results showed that Neanderthal DNA is 99.7 percent identical to modern human DNA, versus, for example, 98.8 percent for modern humans and chimps, according to the study.
Originally posted by LeLeu
reply to post by OwenGP185
I think your on to something here
Our Cro-Magnon and Homo Sapien ancestors interbred with Neanderthal.
To a point where it has left a stain in our genes.
According to a new DNA study, most humans have a little Neanderthal in them—at least 1 to 4 percent of a person's genetic makeup.
The results showed that Neanderthal DNA is 99.7 percent identical to modern human DNA, versus, for example, 98.8 percent for modern humans and chimps, according to the study.
news.nationalgeographic.com
That must be where my mother inlaw gets her hairy knuckles from