It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
I think it was just stamped onto the surface since the imprint is so light and yet so exact. At any rate, this is not the work of simple farmers, and the like.
I am asking you now, to examine this museum exhibit and open your mind
Now there are more of them like that and some with hair, and if you examine the skull on top, you will see these are not the skulls of homo sapiens sapiens because homo sapiens skulls have bone plates on top, that these skulls do not have....
So before you start talking about these migrations to South America and start arguing about Inuits being the first there maybe 20,000 years ago, consider what you are looking at there. You cannot just brush this stuff aside any more than a zealot could regarding the evidence YOU give against the 4,000 year old earth story.
You have to do it that way because the first link goes to the archives, the second link takes you to an archived website. An exhibit of 40,000 year old footprints of modern man in Mexico.
Originally posted by Hanslune
You ignored my questions about granite and concrete, so may I presume you have conceded those?
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by Rocketman7
I am asking you now, to examine this museum exhibit and open your mind
Now there are more of them like that and some with hair, and if you examine the skull on top, you will see these are not the skulls of homo sapiens sapiens because homo sapiens skulls have bone plates on top, that these skulls do not have....
We covered that already, if you believe those are another species please fund the research
Originally posted by Rocketman7
No I didn't see your comment. Please repeat your question or repeat your comment.
Take another look at that pillar. It has barnacles on it. It is 200 km from the Red Sea and it has barnacles on it.
If it was built at the time of Seti I are you suggesting that Abydos was on the shore of the Red Sea at that time?
Originally posted by Hanslune
Insect nests actually Rocketman, there are no barnacles on Abydos - you do know what limestone is made of right?
I have seen whole discovery channel documentaries about these ruins that state with absolute authority that the Inca constructed them. The Inca have never ever said that they made this. Hanslune says the Killke made it and the Inca say that the Virracochas made them
Originally posted by MrsBlonde
here is a photo stream of the Cuzco area and some of the pictures of very recent and completely unremarkable boring sites that are found there Photos of Boring things
I am of course no archeologist I just think this neat
and the beauty of it all is it was built by farmers with to much leisure time by pounding a rock with another rock about 1500 years ago Hanslune could make this in a memorial day weekend .
anyway don't think about the long headed people why study people who purposely elongate their heads when you could be moving heaven and earth to reconstruct Tutankhamen DNA
nothing to see here move along everyone knows Egypt is where all the cool stuff is.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
Did you ever try to reason with an Evangelist? I am trying to reason with one now. Only a different type of Evangelist. I know what barnacles look like. I live by the sea.
And I know what a homo sapiens sapiens skull looks like.
I also know that recently work was done which determined the bulk of the stones of the large pyramid at Giza were constructed from concrete blocks.
But common sense tells me yes, the stones in Peru, were made of a type of concrete.
And it was a very long time ago.
So now it is rock.
But people who refuse to accept the obvious, for whatever reason, are impossible to reason with on any scientific grounds.
I will show you once more from space, the pond above Cusco where you can see the water has flowed over the rocks from this water cistern, and worn down by the water.
www.flashearth.com...
How on earth, anyone with any common sense at all, could arrive at the conclusion, that that was built by indigenous native indians, in the 15th century, is completely beyond me. As I say, that makes about as much sense as a 4,000 year old earth/universe whatever.
So I am sorry, that is not my level of science, neither is it my level to merely use scientific sounding words and studies, which appear scientific, and come from so called scientific institutions, but arrive at such nonsensical conclusions as that.