It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Plugin
[
Well that is perhaps a matter of opinion, allot of those structures in Peru for example looks destroyed, we don't know how they looked right after building.
Our Cathedrals/churches are more easy to build (little stones), then a Pyramid I'm sure and they need allot of maintance, if you wouldn't maintain it at all, it would be just ruins by now where the Pyramids still stands as 1 piece today (at least the big ones)
Anyways ask an engineer and construction workers what would be more easy for him to design&build, my bet is that it would be an Europain Cathedral
The Romans were able to put up a pyramid, of course they built a pyramid out of concrete and they did so in 330 days
Originally posted by anon72
I just saw this, my bad for not seeing earlier.
The Romans were able to put up a pyramid, of course they built a pyramid out of concrete and they did so in 330 days
Okay. A "tad" smaller than Giza. Now.
Putting up a pyramid... okay but they didn't make shafts into it that cut at sharp angles, that had some type of door way up in it. or any of the other things.
And, I got to thinking about something else you said, I believe. About the Romans dismantling items and taking them to Rome etc. For me, moving the stones is far different then cutting them etc-hence the reason for this thread.
This theory has been rejected by Egyptologists in general as it would otherwise suggest that the Sphinx was built long before the era of the First Dynasty (3000 BCE). Egypt (the Sahara) experienced significant rainfalls up to about 6000 BCE, so the Sphinx would have had to be constructed prior to or during this time frame. Every conceivable alternative form of weathering has been proposed, but even to the layman it should be obvious that this type of corrosion could only have been caused by significant rainfall.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Perhaps but we could build a pyramid they couldn't even begin to comprehend how to build a cathedral; remember they had no arch and no viable concrete
We're talking useable space, much of the space inside a cathedral can be used, only a tiny portion of a pyramid can be, most none-Egyptian pyramids could only be used externally if at all
The Great Pyramid of Giza, among the seven wonders of the ancient world, points towards the celestial north pole with a margin of error of only a tiny fraction of one degree.
Big piles of stones do last longer but can they do anything but sit there? A Cathedral can be used for something, pyramids have grave limitations!.
Nope the AE couldn't build nor did they understand what an vault is (they had corbel arches thou), a flying buttress or any of the more advanced building techniques, they were blunt, basic and solid. You might want to take a look at what is need for the construction of a cathedral.
The Romans were able to put up a pyramid, of course they built a pyramid out of concrete and they did so in 330 days
Originally posted by Plugin
What about the rain erosion of the Great Sphinx.
This theory has been rejected by Egyptologists in general as it would otherwise suggest that the Sphinx was built long before the era of the First Dynasty (3000 BCE). Egypt (the Sahara) experienced significant rainfalls up to about 6000 BCE, so the Sphinx would have had to be constructed prior to or during this time frame. Every conceivable alternative form of weathering has been proposed, but even to the layman it should be obvious that this type of corrosion could only have been caused by significant rainfall.
More to read about it here: www.robertschoch.com...
edit on 1-3-2012 by Plugin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LucidDreamer85
reply to post by Hanslune
What do you mean they left no traces?
They left the stones !
That is like saying the Egyptians never left any evidence behind, while ignoring the pyramids.
Just because you refuse to look at the truth, and identify it as such, does not mean that it isn't there.
People who think they already know everything will fail to see the real truth, because they have blocked it out, because according to them, they already know everything.
Originally posted by LucidDreamer85
reply to post by Hanslune
k now do that a thousand times over within 200 years and have them be 20X the size.
Nice try.
IT's one thing to show a sculpture that took one person 4 years to do. No multiply that based on what we are actually talking about.
The stuff you posted has KNOWN ways of achieving what you posted. we've known of these ways.
learn more.