It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
(Reuters) - A report this week showing rampant foreclosure abuse in San Francisco reflects similar levels of lender fraud and faulty documentation across the United States, say experts and officials who have done studies in other parts of the country.
The audit of almost 400 foreclosures in San Francisco found that 84 percent of them appeared to be illegal, according to the study released by the California city on Wednesday.
"The audit in San Francisco is the most detailed and comprehensive that has been done - but it's likely those numbers are comparable nationally," Diane Thompson,
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by XPLodER
Dear XPLodER,
Good to see you again. I'd like you to straighten me out on this issue.
I understand that having a machine sign the documents instead of a human is against the law. OK, got it.
What harm did it do to the borrower who hadn't kept up with his payments?
After all, it never would have gotten to the foreclosure process if payments had been made when due.
Appreciate any help you can offer.
Originally posted by randomname
basically it's like a bank robber who got caught, but instead of being punished he was reimbursed gas money, publicly denounced, but not by name, and matched dollar of dollar for all the loot he stole and gambled away in vegas.
what would this bank robber think, if that's what happened to him instead of 25 years in a colorado supermax.
However, a clause in the provisional agreement – which has not been made public – allows the banks to count future loan modifications made under a 2009 foreclosure-prevention initiative towards their restructuring obligations for the new settlement, according to people familiar with the matter. The existing $30bn initiative, the Home Affordable Modification Programme (Hamp), provides taxpayer funds as an incentive to banks, third party investors and troubled borrowers to arrange loan modifications.
Neil Barofsky, a Democrat and the former special inspector-general of the troubled asset relief programme, described this clause as “scandalous”.
"The audit in San Francisco is the most detailed and comprehensive that has been done - but it's likely those numbers are comparable nationally," Diane Thompson, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, told Reuters.
Home loans have dropped 33 percent from a 2006 peak that was fueled by generous loans, often to people with dubious credit records.
In many cases during the housing bubble that burst in 2008, original mortgages were repackaged and sold to so many investors
"There have been a very high level of irregularities across the country."
The banks have never formally admitted any wrongdoing. A Wells Fargo spokesman said, "We have acknowledged we didn't always follow our policies in the foreclosure process. We found some areas where there were deficiencies in our process."
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by XPLodER
Dear XPLodER,
Good to see you again. I'd like you to straighten me out on this issue.
I understand that having a machine sign the documents instead of a human is against the law. OK, got it. What harm did it do to the borrower who hadn't kept up with his payments? After all, it never would have gotten to the foreclosure process if payments had been made when due.
Appreciate any help you can offer.
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by CookieMonster09
They put a gun to your head and made you purchase that $900,000 house near the ocean in California even though you only earn minimum wage, right?