Originally posted by Gab1159
Update 2:
How could I forget that? That's some major news!

Arrests made in Italy after discovery of $6 trillion in fake U.S. bonds

edition.cnn.com...

Italian authorities on Friday arrested eight people in possession of an estimated $6 trillion in counterfeit U.S. Treasury bonds, according to Italian paramilitary police and an Italian news agency. The discovery of the fake bonds -- made to look as if they were printed by the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1934 -- came about as part of an investigation into a local mafia association.

No, they weren't fake bonds. You don't fake 6 trillions, then sell them to some investor and get away alive with it. It just doesn't happen this way, you sell 6 trillion fake bonds and you won't even last a day. No one will buy 6 trillion fake bonds, because when you make such a purchase, you make sure it is not faked. So partial disclosure by the media? Yes, I think.

While we reserve judgment on the authenticity of the bonds, what we wonder is whether the boxes were also fake. Because while we can understand why someone would counterfeit the Treasury paper itself, what we don't get is why someone would go the extra effort to also create a "fake" compartment in which to store it. In this case a compartment that is property of the "CHICAGO FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM." Perhaps Fed uberdove and Chicago Fed President Charles Evans will be kind enough to explain why Versailles Treaty Chicago Fed crates are floating around in Europe (and filled with $6 trillion in supposedly fake bearer bonds)?

Originally posted by ILikeStars

YouTube Link

Originally posted by MsVen

Originally posted by Gab1159
Update 2:
How could I forget that? That's some major news!

Arrests made in Italy after discovery of $6 trillion in fake U.S. bonds

edition.cnn.com...

Italian authorities on Friday arrested eight people in possession of an estimated $6 trillion in counterfeit U.S. Treasury bonds, according to Italian paramilitary police and an Italian news agency. The discovery of the fake bonds -- made to look as if they were printed by the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1934 -- came about as part of an investigation into a local mafia association.

No, they weren't fake bonds. You don't fake 6 trillions, then sell them to some investor and get away alive with it. It just doesn't happen this way, you sell 6 trillion fake bonds and you won't even last a day. No one will buy 6 trillion fake bonds, because when you make such a purchase, you make sure it is not faked. So partial disclosure by the media? Yes, I think.

I wholeheartedly concur. These fake bust bonds are clearly more than we are being told. Look back at 2009, and you got Italians and Swiss involved in bond busts, left right and center with varying amounts of bonds totalling in the billions. Who does that? Who would cash that? It's ridiculous they are even trying to pass this story off to us as such. It's all adding up to weigh in favour of the Fulford/Wilcock "Trillion Dollar Lawsuit" articles. There's a lot of money being moved --- and it's STATE money. I dunno who's ... but it's state money.

Anyway I found this article about the recent $6 Trillion bond bust. The bonds were apparently found contained within Chicago Fed crates. The question asked is, who would bother to counterfeit the crate too?

Zerohedge - Why Were The Trillions In Fake Bonds Held In Chicago Fed Crates?

While we reserve judgment on the authenticity of the bonds, what we wonder is whether the boxes were also fake. Because while we can understand why someone would counterfeit the Treasury paper itself, what we don't get is why someone would go the extra effort to also create a "fake" compartment in which to store it. In this case a compartment that is property of the "CHICAGO FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM." Perhaps Fed uberdove and Chicago Fed President Charles Evans will be kind enough to explain why Versailles Treaty Chicago Fed crates are floating around in Europe (and filled with $6 trillion in supposedly fake bearer bonds)?

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Gab1159

---

Wow, what does this mean? You think they are running as fast as they can from the spotlight? From the collapse? Isn't Hillary taking the place of Zoelleck?

edit on 19-2-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Gab1159

---

Hmmm I'm inclined to think they are running from the collapse with their own golden parachutes and also running from culpability. But Hillary moving to Zoelleck's position defies that idea. But she could technically still go to an underground bunker if she needs.