It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nobodysavedme
The people who keep them have a very small penis and keep a big nasty vicious dog to compensate.
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
They can't specify breed by AKC standards, so they lump the fighting breeds all together.
they want the public to know that the odds of a fighting breed injuring or killing you is higher than with other breeds.
You have to accept the fact that some animals are more dangerous than others, and some breeds of dog are more dangerous others.
Originally posted by lordbayfin
pits are the rat race of all dogs.. sorry to say
I remember in the 80s here in NYC all the pit fights in parks ...
rumors of feeding them just gun powder to get them crazy and what not...
worth less breed of dogs
pits dont ever have a really species name and no red nose pit / brown / blue and pink nose pits don't even come close to a species name.
Originally posted by HoppedUp
I (at the risk of sounding ignorant) HATE dog owners that get a dog of any breed with intent to intimidate others. It's simply disgusting, trashy behavior. You can tell they have "ghetto trained" it to be hyper-aggressive and be rewarded for it. There are more dog owners like that out there than many realize, could even be your own neighbor. People are so insecure and simple that they need a dog to protect them. I'm sorry but that's the lamest thing ever. If you need protection so bad, learn a martial art, get ADT, qualify with a pistol and get one, heck, get a taser. Don't hide behind a dog and get mad when other people aren't having your crap from Cujo. It's not the pit that should be banned, it's attitudes of "Billy Bad" you know what coming from the owners. "Oh look at mee, I got a Westside Corso Brazilero and I feed it gunpowder. Better not mess with me, I'm tough." This is the problem.