It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XyZeR
No I debunk the messengers's motives, I never attacked, just pointed out that Newsmax's journalistic credibility is non-existent.
And... Ha that's rich, for someone who is constantly ignoring FACTS and CHOOSING to embrace ignorance about all the myths people who can't stand having "non-white man" in the White house.
It's so pathetic, it's beyond belief.
Originally posted by beezzer
Why bring race into the debate?
The race card has been maxed out.
Originally posted by luccadeo
I have often wondered about why no one has ever come forward from his past to say they were friends or anything. No school buddies, no childhood friends
Originally posted by jrod
biggest being his social security number.
The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations
In my opinion Barry
Originally posted by m0rphine
Isn't ignoring facts exactly what you're doing?
Originally posted by jrod
The first 3 digits of one's SSN number are based on the area where one is born.
Prior to 1973, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the office code in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be in the area where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office
According to his SSN he was not born in Hawaii.
Originally posted by XyZeR
Originally posted by m0rphine
Isn't ignoring facts exactly what you're doing?
Please enlighten me, which FACTS I am supposedly ignoring ????
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by spoor
Who applied for Obama's SS# in Connecticut?
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by spoor
Who applied for Obama's SS# in Connecticut?
*cricket*
*cricket*
*cricket*
(It might have been Dick Cheney! What way to bring all back to blaming Bush! )
Sorry, was silly for a moment. I'll behave.edit on 20-2-2012 by beezzer because: (no reason given)
The real question is: what do these deluded people want to get out of this constant repeating of things which have been debunked. That Obama resigns?
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by spoor
Who applied for Obama's SS# in Connecticut?
The real question is: what do these deluded people want to get out of this constant repeating of things which have been debunked. That Obama resigns?
The ones listed from the news source you wish to discredit.
If they are not true, feel free to prove the fallacy.
Start a thread on the other presidents.
This thread is about Obama.
Originally posted by XyZeR
They have been proven, you just choose to NOT accept them, why is beyond me...
If you don't see a problem with "Newsmax" beeing a valid news-organisation ( FYI it's a right wing propaganda site that deliberatly spreads filth to cater to wacky Truthers, who will regurgitate anything negative about Obama.)
I'm done with this thread, these birther people are worse then creationists
You could slap proof of everything in their faces all day long and they'dd still deny it.
Deny ignorance....yeah right
The Obama campaign told Newsmax that Obama self-financed his three years at Harvard Law School with loans, and did not receive any scholarship from Harvard Law school.
LaBolt denied that Obama received any financial assistance from Harvard or from outside parties. “No - he paid his way through by taking out loans,” he said in an email to Newsmax.
At the time, Harvard cost around $25,000 a year, or $75,000 for the three years that Obama attended. And as president of the Harvard Law Review, he received no stipend from the school, Harvard spokesman Mike Armini said.
“That is considered a volunteer position,” Armini said. “There is no salary or grant associated with it.”
So if the figures cited by the Obama campaign for the Senator’s student loans are accurate, that means that Obama came up with more than $32,000 over three years from sources other than loans to pay for tuition, room and board.
Where did he find the money? Did it come from friends of Khalid Al Mansour? And why would a radical Muslim activist with ties to the Saudi royal family be raising money for Barack Obama?
That’s the question the Obama campaign still won’t answer.
Michelle Obama Speaks Out
Speaking at a campaign event in Haverford, Pa, in April of this year, Michelle Obama claimed that her husband had “just paid off his loan debt” for his Harvard Law School education.
In an appearance in Zanesville, Ohio, in February she bemoaned the fact that many American families were strapped with student loan payments for years after graduation.
“The only reason we’re not in that position is that Barack wrote two best-selling books,” she said. The first of those best-sellers netted the couple $1.2 million in royalties in 2005.
In response to Newsmax questions about the Obama’s college loans, a campaign spokesman cited a report in The Chicago Sun claiming that Obama borrowed $42,753 to pay for Harvard Law School, and “tens of thousands” more to pay for undergraduate studies at Columbia.
The same report said that Michelle Obama borrowed $40,762 to pay for her years at Harvard Law School.
But a Newsmax review of Senator Obama’s financial disclosures found no trace of any outstanding college loans, going back to 2000.
Originally posted by m0rphine
Originally posted by XyZeR
They have been proven, you just choose to NOT accept them, why is beyond me...
If you don't see a problem with "Newsmax" beeing a valid news-organisation ( FYI it's a right wing propaganda site that deliberatly spreads filth to cater to wacky Truthers, who will regurgitate anything negative about Obama.)
I'm done with this thread, these birther people are worse then creationists
You could slap proof of everything in their faces all day long and they'dd still deny it.
Deny ignorance....yeah right
The Obama campaign told Newsmax that Obama self-financed his three years at Harvard Law School with loans, and did not receive any scholarship from Harvard Law school.
LaBolt denied that Obama received any financial assistance from Harvard or from outside parties. “No - he paid his way through by taking out loans,” he said in an email to Newsmax.
At the time, Harvard cost around $25,000 a year, or $75,000 for the three years that Obama attended. And as president of the Harvard Law Review, he received no stipend from the school, Harvard spokesman Mike Armini said.
“That is considered a volunteer position,” Armini said. “There is no salary or grant associated with it.”
So if the figures cited by the Obama campaign for the Senator’s student loans are accurate, that means that Obama came up with more than $32,000 over three years from sources other than loans to pay for tuition, room and board.
Where did he find the money? Did it come from friends of Khalid Al Mansour? And why would a radical Muslim activist with ties to the Saudi royal family be raising money for Barack Obama?
That’s the question the Obama campaign still won’t answer.
Michelle Obama Speaks Out
Speaking at a campaign event in Haverford, Pa, in April of this year, Michelle Obama claimed that her husband had “just paid off his loan debt” for his Harvard Law School education.
In an appearance in Zanesville, Ohio, in February she bemoaned the fact that many American families were strapped with student loan payments for years after graduation.
“The only reason we’re not in that position is that Barack wrote two best-selling books,” she said. The first of those best-sellers netted the couple $1.2 million in royalties in 2005.
In response to Newsmax questions about the Obama’s college loans, a campaign spokesman cited a report in The Chicago Sun claiming that Obama borrowed $42,753 to pay for Harvard Law School, and “tens of thousands” more to pay for undergraduate studies at Columbia.
The same report said that Michelle Obama borrowed $40,762 to pay for her years at Harvard Law School.
But a Newsmax review of Senator Obama’s financial disclosures found no trace of any outstanding college loans, going back to 2000.
You have not addressed those at all. You can claim fallacies have been proven all you want, doesn't make it true. I would tell you once again to prove it, but I can see you are running off now.
Buh bye
Originally posted by XyZeR
Originally posted by m0rphine
Originally posted by XyZeR
They have been proven, you just choose to NOT accept them, why is beyond me...
If you don't see a problem with "Newsmax" beeing a valid news-organisation ( FYI it's a right wing propaganda site that deliberatly spreads filth to cater to wacky Truthers, who will regurgitate anything negative about Obama.)
I'm done with this thread, these birther people are worse then creationists
You could slap proof of everything in their faces all day long and they'dd still deny it.
Deny ignorance....yeah right
The Obama campaign told Newsmax that Obama self-financed his three years at Harvard Law School with loans, and did not receive any scholarship from Harvard Law school.
LaBolt denied that Obama received any financial assistance from Harvard or from outside parties. “No - he paid his way through by taking out loans,” he said in an email to Newsmax.
At the time, Harvard cost around $25,000 a year, or $75,000 for the three years that Obama attended. And as president of the Harvard Law Review, he received no stipend from the school, Harvard spokesman Mike Armini said.
“That is considered a volunteer position,” Armini said. “There is no salary or grant associated with it.”
So if the figures cited by the Obama campaign for the Senator’s student loans are accurate, that means that Obama came up with more than $32,000 over three years from sources other than loans to pay for tuition, room and board.
Where did he find the money? Did it come from friends of Khalid Al Mansour? And why would a radical Muslim activist with ties to the Saudi royal family be raising money for Barack Obama?
That’s the question the Obama campaign still won’t answer.
Michelle Obama Speaks Out
Speaking at a campaign event in Haverford, Pa, in April of this year, Michelle Obama claimed that her husband had “just paid off his loan debt” for his Harvard Law School education.
In an appearance in Zanesville, Ohio, in February she bemoaned the fact that many American families were strapped with student loan payments for years after graduation.
“The only reason we’re not in that position is that Barack wrote two best-selling books,” she said. The first of those best-sellers netted the couple $1.2 million in royalties in 2005.
In response to Newsmax questions about the Obama’s college loans, a campaign spokesman cited a report in The Chicago Sun claiming that Obama borrowed $42,753 to pay for Harvard Law School, and “tens of thousands” more to pay for undergraduate studies at Columbia.
The same report said that Michelle Obama borrowed $40,762 to pay for her years at Harvard Law School.
But a Newsmax review of Senator Obama’s financial disclosures found no trace of any outstanding college loans, going back to 2000.
You have not addressed those at all. You can claim fallacies have been proven all you want, doesn't make it true. I would tell you once again to prove it, but I can see you are running off now.
Buh bye
I'm running of because of the lack of intelligence, of reason, of discussions (you poeple are not capable of it):
Obama is your president, and will be for another term, Nothing of the drivel you Truthers post or proclaim will
change that fact, Enjoy
Buy bye