It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

World Wide Seismic Event...

page: 33
0
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 06:07 AM
link   
There's been a 4.0 in Southern California. (Several more than that globally according to the EMSC.)

Gakona is offscale low right now, and all the traces are either off-scale low or extremely low except for Resolute Bay which seems to be diverging at the moment...hmmm.

And we're having a solar storm.

Have a good Tuesday!




posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 04:44 PM
link   
Am I seeing things here?
Does Anchorage not have a Z (vertical) trace?
137.229.36.30...
*blink*

IRIS is showing 8 quakes today, including a 6.4 in Papua New Guinea.
www.iris.edu...

And, hoo-boy, is the USGS shaking worldwide!
aslwww.cr.usgs.gov...

And now I'm back from my vacation. Let the conspiracies roll.

-B.



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Hmmm... hasnt it been about 72 hours since the last major transmission from HAARP??



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 06:53 PM
link   
Guys!

Where the hell is Carlsberg Ridge!!!!

EARTHQUAKE on 15/07/2003 at 20:27 (UTC)
CARLSBERG RIDGE

MAGNITUDE: MW 7.8

Data provided by: BUC IMP INDC INGV LDG LED LJU LOR NEIC NEWS
NOR ODC RNS SED

Latitude = 1.75 S
Longitude = 68.16 E
Origin Time = 20:27:59.2 (UTC)
Depth = 33 Km
RMS = 0.92 sec
Gap = 114 degrees
95% confidence ellipse: - Semi major = 22.4 Km
- Semi minor = 8.0 Km
- Azimuth of major axis = 39 degrees

IRIS IS SHOWING IT AT 7.6!!! THIS HAS **GOT** TO CAUSE TSUNAMIS...HOLY SH|T!

AND A 6.4 RIGHT BEFORE THAT!!!

15-JUL-2003 18:46:37 -3.82 152.15 6.4 33.0 NEW IRELAND REGION, P.N.G.



[Edited on 15-7-2003 by Valhall]

[Edited on 15-7-2003 by Valhall]



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 07:33 PM
link   
A magnitude 5.7 earthquake IN SOUTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA has occurred at:
0.50S 100.77E Depth 146km Mon Jul 14 20:00:06 2003 UTC



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 07:40 PM
link   
I'm ... What time zone does the IRIS quake thing run on. That way I know if it happened two hors ago, or two seconds ago.



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 07:44 PM
link   
Universal Time (UT) which is the same as GMT. So we're sitting at about 0100 UT right now (07/16). That means it happened about 5 hours ago.



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Banshee
Am I seeing things here?
Does Anchorage not have a Z (vertical) trace?
137.229.36.30...
*blink*




Holy cow! You're right. It has been offscale high all this time!!!
It just did a MAJOR blip back down on to the scale a little while ago, and then went back offscale.



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 07:58 PM
link   
What the f*ck is going on here?
I've never seen any of the magnetometers go offscale high for so freakin' long.
I've had an unsettled feeling of not wanting to leave the house all day today. How's everyone else feeling?

That big boomer is off the east coast of Africa. Nothing on the newswires about it yet.

....holy $hit.
aslwww.cr.usgs.gov...

The 72-hour timeframe strikes again...
*frowning*

-B.



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 08:02 PM
link   


Originally posted by Banshee
Am I seeing things here?
Does Anchorage not have a Z (vertical) trace?
137.229.36.30...
*blink*


Sorry to burst your bubble guys but the blue line has appeared. Its at the very top to the right. Its completely off the scale and to the right. The link provided above this post shows so much seismic actvity that its scary.




Nightwalker

[Edited on 16-7-2003 by Nightwalker]



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 11:12 PM
link   
Damn, I skip this thread for one day and all hell breaks loose...

OK, we have VERY significant planetwide seismic activity, which is not a good thing. The timing is very interesting, it coincides perfectly (72 hour lag) with that massive burst given off by Gakona over the weekend.

We have had a good sized transmission event for the last 8 hours, although Gakona doesnt reflect near the magnitudof transmission that Yellow Knife in particular does. Also, the extreme variance in verticle trace element out of Anchorage is very disturbing.... I might be going out on a limb here, but I would tend to expect a pretty good seismic action in that vicinity....

IRIS showing a Mag 7.6 (!!!!!!!!!!!) in the Carlsberg Ridge, off the West Coast of Africa. I have yet to see this on the news... even if it was in middle of the ocean (actually, BECAUSE it was) this could be VERY damaging when the Tsunami hits...

Mag 6.4 in New Ireland region, north of Australia.... I would avoid surfing off the Aussie north coast for a day or two...

Geomagnetic storm active, although no active solar flares... Question is, is this being incited by HAARP, or is HAARP using it as camoflage again???

www.n3kl.org...

AURORA WATCH: High-latitude sky watchers should be alert for auroras after nightfall on July 15th when Earth might enter a solar wind stream flowing from a coronal hole on the sun. A similar encounter with solar wind on July 11th and 12th sparked Northern Lights across Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota and much of Canada.

spaceweather.com...

I would expect additional seismic activity, including some significant quakes in 72 hours... Keep watching Alaska...



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 11:24 PM
link   
Carlsberg Ridge has had 3 pretty good aftershocks since the big boom. 2 over 5.0.



posted on Jul, 15 2003 @ 11:37 PM
link   
And nothing on the news about it... Any news on the Tsunami??



posted on Jul, 16 2003 @ 05:23 AM
link   
Yeah, it is the gross oversight of the media on things like this that show their dirty undies.

already had a 5.6 at Carlsberg today (and a 4.9 that Iris isn't reporting yet, but no surprise considering they still aren't showing the 3 good-sized aftershocks from yesterday).

We're in a solar storm...and - do I have to say it - the mag traces appear to be winding up to a full fledged freak out.

Happy Wednesday???



posted on Jul, 16 2003 @ 05:48 AM
link   
This is absolutely crazy. Let me quote from the INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION GROUP FOR THE TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEM IN THE PACIFIC (ICG/ITSU) website:

TSUNAMI SAFETY RULES
All earthquakes do not cause tsunamis, but many do. When you hear that an earthquake has occurred, stand by for a tsunami emergency.
An earthquake in your area is a natural tsunami warning. Do not stay in low-lying coastal areas after a strong earthquake has been felt.
A tsunami is not a single wave, but a series of waves. Stay out of danger areas until an "all-clear" is issued by competent authority.
Approaching tsunamis are sometimes preceded by a noticeable rise or fall of coastal water. This is nature's tsunami warning and should be heeded.
A small tsunami at one point on the shore can be extremely large a few kilometers away. Don't let the modest size of one make you lose respect for all.
The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center does not issue false alarms. When a warning is issued, a tsunami exists. The tsunami of May 1960 killed 61 people in Hilo, Hawaii, and they thought it was "just another false alarm."
All tsunamis-like hurricanes-are potentially dangerous, even though they may not damage every coastline they strike.
Never go down to the shore to watch for a tsunami. When you can see the wave you are too close to escape it.
Sooner or later, tsunamis visit every coastline in the Pacific. Warnings apply to you if you live in any Pacific coastal area.
During a tsunami emergency, your local civil defense, police, and other emergency organizations will try to save your life. Give them your fullest co-operation.


Okay, with that said, I can't find a single tsunami warning system that even mentions there could be a resultant tsunami. Seems to me the minute you have a 7.+ in the middle of an ocean, you issue the warning, and then retract if you find no evidence...just like the warnings above say "earthquake is an early warning to tsunami"...

hope you guys can have better luck than me. I liked to think some where, some one is watching out for the people on nearby islands and shores...

but I got a bad feeling the answer is no.



posted on Jul, 16 2003 @ 05:53 AM
link   
Well, here is an article stating that there is no tsunami warning system for the Indian ocean...article dated 1998. Guess nobody gave a $h|t in the past 5 years...

www.bom.gov.au...

that's pathetic.



posted on Jul, 16 2003 @ 07:35 AM
link   
Hey all soz been busy....
Wow iv neva seen USGS have so many black squares something has been shakin the earth up aslwww.cr.usgs.gov...

By the way it seems i was right about Resolute Bay, its active when other stations arnt....

If ur getting reved up over the last spike ..... take a look at the current one its below the 1000 plot not only Gakona but just about every facility exept Resolute Bay... nice timing too jsut after about 72 hours of last spike, we gonna get something and its going to be big, these past global events are just a lil warning by look of it.. ahh wellz i guess we can enjoy the show



posted on Jul, 16 2003 @ 10:35 AM
link   
A magnitude 6.5 earthquake IN THE NEW IRELAND REGION, P.N.G. has occurred at:
3.83S 152.17E Depth 33km Tue Jul 15 18:46:37 2003 UTC

A magnitude 5.6 earthquake IN CARLSBERG RIDGE has occurred at:
2.67S 68.39E Depth 10km Wed Jul 16 02:29:48 2003 UTC



posted on Jul, 16 2003 @ 11:05 AM
link   
USGS finally lists Mag 7.6 in Indian Ocean...

Glad they could get it to us 24 hours late....

Magnitude 7.6 CARLSBERG RIDGE
2003 July 15 20:27:50 UTC
Preliminary Earthquake Report
U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center
World Data Center for Seismology, Denver



Magnitude 7.6
Date-Time Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at 20:27:50 (UTC) - Coordinated Universal Time
Wednesday, July 16, 2003 at 01:27:50 AM local time at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location 2.56S 68.30E
Depth 10.0 kilometers
Region CARLSBERG RIDGE
Reference 635 km (395 miles) NW of Diego Garcia, Chagos Archipelago
945 km (580 miles) SW of MALE, Maldives
1650 km (1030 miles) SW of COLOMBO, Sri Lanka

Location Quality Error estimate: horizontal +/- 9.9 km; depth fixed by location program
Location Quality
Parameters Nst=79, Nph=79, Dmin=3315.8 km, Rmss=0.94 sec, Erho=9.9 km, Erzz=0 km, Gp=34.9 degrees
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


The following is a release by the United States Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center: A major earthquake occurred 635 km (395 miles) NW of Diego Garcia, Chagos Archipelago at 2:27 PM MDT, Jul 15, 2003 (Jul 16 at 1:27 AM local time in .). The magnitude and location may be revised when additional data and further analysis results are available. This earthquake is located in a remote area and no damage or casualties are expected.

gldss7.cr.usgs.gov...



posted on Jul, 16 2003 @ 11:08 AM
link   
We are indeed in store for a bumpy ride.... this is rather unprecedented HAARP activity, at least as long as Ive been watching it.............




Care to guess what'll be happening about Saturday?????



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 30  31  32    34  35  36 >>

log in

join