It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Forget being called husband and wife, gay rights group wants 'parties to marriage' in bill to lega

page: 6
6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 06:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by kaylaluv
 


Didn't I say that I have a metaphysical view that we carry our past in our genetic makeup?


You did add this to your post later. Speaking of Karma, could it be that we victims of the globalist agenda deserve to be victims because of something in our karmic past? Perhaps we were part of some evil plot against the populace in prior lives, so now we are just "paying the piper"?




posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 07:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by kaylaluv

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by kaylaluv
 


And isn't this a conspiracy website? Perhaps you revel in being the debunker here.


Nothing wrong with bringing a little common sense and critical thinking into the mix, so yes, you can call me the debunker in this case.


And did you engage in critical thinking when you accepted the Kinsey report as the gospel truth and did not review anything from the opposing side? Even a simple compare and contrast?



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 07:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by kaylaluv

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by kaylaluv
 


Didn't I say that I have a metaphysical view that we carry our past in our genetic makeup?


You did add this to your post later. Speaking of Karma, could it be that we victims of the globalist agenda deserve to be victims because of something in our karmic past? Perhaps we were part of some evil plot against the populace in prior lives, so now we are just "paying the piper"?


Of course that is possible. The other possibility is that we have consistently been victims of those who over many lifetimes have continued to oppress. But that is probably a story for another thread. It would require a study of the Book of Enoch to clarify that.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 07:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

And did you engage in critical thinking when you accepted the Kinsey report as the gospel truth and did not review anything from the opposing side? Even a simple compare and contrast?


I never even brought up the Kinsey report - you did. I listed several other sources, unrelated to Kinsey. The source you provided seemed to concentrate on pornography, not on the causes of homosexuality, which is what I thought we were discussing.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 08:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by kaylaluv

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

And did you engage in critical thinking when you accepted the Kinsey report as the gospel truth and did not review anything from the opposing side? Even a simple compare and contrast?


I never even brought up the Kinsey report - you did. I listed several other sources, unrelated to Kinsey. The source you provided seemed to concentrate on pornography, not on the causes of homosexuality, which is what I thought we were discussing.


Was away for the weekend.

I have to say something about using the Kinsey report as a "steadfast".

I've been "gabbing" online for 20+ years. Started with ICQ. Hubby and I owned a computer service. He fixed 'em - - I ran the front desk. Mostly I hung out on the computer all day long - - reading - reading - reading - gabbing - - and discussing for 20+ years.

I've read all kinds of crap - - from every side and every angle.

LIke Madam Curie - Mary Anning - Sister Kenny - George Washington Carver (and more) - - - who were truly dedicated to their chosen field (despite controversy) - - - Kinsey is still the "base" - - - "go to guy" - - - for sexual studies.

"Belief" is not science. It is also not dedicated years devoted to a specific study.

Some question Kinsey and his methods. But to my knowledge - - he has not been duplicated or discredited.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 08:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by mamabeth
reply to post by kaylaluv
 


You don't teach young children that being "gay" is a lifestyle
choice they can make.I am talking YOUNG children,grade
school age.If these issues lable me a bigot,so be it! I won't
back down when it involves children.


Of course you don't 'teach' children what lifestyle choices to make - if they're gay, they're gay. If they're not, they're not. We should guide them with love and knowlege as best we can to make decisions based on their intuition and who they are so they don't grow up with issues as so many do, due to how adults try to warp them by telling them what they can and cannot be.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 12:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by Garfee

Originally posted by mamabeth
reply to post by kaylaluv
 


You don't teach young children that being "gay" is a lifestyle
choice they can make.I am talking YOUNG children,grade
school age.If these issues lable me a bigot,so be it! I won't
back down when it involves children.


Of course you don't 'teach' children what lifestyle choices to make - if they're gay, they're gay. If they're not, they're not. We should guide them with love and knowlege as best we can to make decisions based on their intuition and who they are so they don't grow up with issues as so many do, due to how adults try to warp them by telling them what they can and cannot be.




Regardless of the point you WANT to make, the point everyone IS making is that we teach children that being different is a bad thing. As I have stated before, if being different was so bad we'd kill all of the cripples. But since we're able to accept a PHYSICAL difference, why in the world would a sexual difference (one that still allows display of love) be too much?

You homophobes are ridiculous.



posted on Mar, 9 2012 @ 03:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Starchild23
 


Please read a post objectively. I am homosexual.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join