reply to post by truthermantwo
I think it's interesting that I asked for 2 things, testimony and evidence.
You completely ignore the testimony portion and try to claim the Scientific Method isn't good enough for you.
It was good enough for Newton, Galileo, Watson and Crick(near the anniversary of when they found the structure of DNA), and countless others but it's
too dehumanizing for you...
The Scientific Method isn't there to remove the human element but the mistakes humans can make.
The method is there to insure accuracy and repeatability every time it's preformed no matter where it's preformed.
Humans make mistakes we aren't perfect, the Scientific Method is there to catch and account for those mistakes.
That way when something new/wonderful/awesome is discovered we know it's not a fluke or due to human mistake.
Humans are still required in the Scientific Method, the method is just a guideline for honesty and accuracy.
Humans are needed to make the intuitive leaps, to ask the great questions to reach for the impossible.
What you are saying is, you don't want accuracy or honesty.
Don't hide from the scientific method and say it's because you don't want to dehumanize your claims.
You are hiding from the Scientific Method because you are afraid of honesty.
You are afraid of being found out as a liar or crazy.
So again I say back your claims up using honest, reliable, repeatable, accurate means IE the Scientific Method or go down in the history of this
thread as a Liar or Crazy.
You can still have your friends give your testimony that will at least raise your claims to 48-49.9% if they stand up to questioning.
You won't do that though because you are just trolling or need help.
Oh well too bad.