posted on Mar, 2 2012 @ 05:08 PM
I am the author of the first report and have quickly browsed through the majority of these posts. As convinced as I was of vote manipulation the day I
wrote the report, now there is NO doubt that the votes in NH, Iowa, SC, Florida, and Nevada have been reassigned for the benefit of Mitt Romney.
Several statistical analysts have been working to debunk the allegations of the original report. Their efforts have not only fallen short but have
reinforced and proven the fact that the vote totals have been altered to boost Mitt Romney. Just as I pointed out in the original report, the
alogrithms used to accomplish the vote theft are very crude and, therefore, easy to identify. Some of the research has been through online forums and
some has been by independent analysts. My understanding is that a report has been sent to "dozens" of analysts for their review and independent
analysis. Following is what we know to date:
1. The huge difference between Romney's low vote precinct total percentage and high vote precinct total percentage is not caused by any combination
of demographics in any of the counties examined. Its cause is a mathematical algorithm that flips votes from another candidate's total, usually Ron
Paul but all 3 have been victimized, into Romney's total count. If the reader would like to know more details, go to
2. The only precincts affected are the ones in "significant" counties that represent a certain minimum percentage of the total vote in that
3. At least 4 independent statistical methods have been used to prove that Romney's gains are impossible in an honest election.
4. I encourage anyone that can help explain this anomaly to submit your report. Because all of the obvious demographical factors have been discounted,
this has escalated to a high academic level.
To the posters on this site claiming that the initial paper was so "bad", "would have gotten an F in Statistics," etc., please grace the rest of
us with your genius by supplying your analysis that would explain this in any way other than pure computer algorithmic vote theft. But if you aren't
going to do an in-depth analysis, stop spewing troll garbage targeted at the weak- minded.