Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Remote Viewers Predict Catastrophic Meteor Impact Before 2013

page: 8
56
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 18 2012 @ 08:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Talon22
 

I feel the same about Alex Jones...where is he and Sweaty Dave on this thread???
edit on 18-2-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)




posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 10:44 AM
link   
To tell you, idk where you get this info from but if something is to happen big time - solar flare, tectonics, it is definitely not going to be a meteor, asteroid or any object of that kind.

In order to affect the climate and cause earthquakes, an incoming object has to be at least 500 km diameter, so far 5 meter or 2 meter objects would do one big nothing/ No incoming objects of that kind are observed.

Your 'catastrophic' is over-sensational



posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Imtor
 


find the KillShot video on pg3. its a series of events not just one thing. until anything happens there is only talk about it. I think adults are mature enough to know that nobody has a crystal ball to see the future.
edit on 19-2-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 12:09 PM
link   
In "UFO's: The Secret Evidence", abductee Amaury Rivera mentioned an asteroid impact in the Atlantic and worldwide devastation.



posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 04:00 PM
link   
^ Dreams are also a way of contact, I've dreamed witnessing four types of cataclysms that felt quite real: volcano, flood, drought and incoming meteor, also alien symbols that I do not understand, but I neither know when, nor what I can do about it. So yes in theory these things will happen but abductee never even heard tells something, what ? believe !?



posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 06:14 PM
link   
reply to post by Imtor
 


hey Its cool. Its not for everybody. Maybe it will be a selective event.Like a tornado, where everybody in town goes to church but the people who live thank god as if they prayed harder so their prayers were answered.

See, what I say makes perfect sense to me.



posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 09:30 PM
link   
With a healthy dose of skepticism, if there is a nuclear blast in North Korea soon, I'm going to really start to wonder.

On some level, I think remote viewing should be possible. My own opinion is that time is illusory and reality is holographic, which allows for certain things, but I think we're probably really inadequate about exploring beyond this physical dimension. Maybe that's why I cut possible charlatans more slack.



posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 10:45 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 10:48 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Feb, 19 2012 @ 11:00 PM
link   


Be careful what you ask for. One of my developers programmed this into an app for me after I made such a joke. Only for my userid.


You forgot the bunny fluff. It is truly necessary for a full appreciation of the moment of annihilation.

You and TheEmotionalSocialist can roll around in it while the sky sings.
edit on 2012/2/19 by Aeons because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 12:20 AM
link   
reply to post by rebellender
 


The world ended long ago, everything is static. The end has been postponed redirected at a latter time before the rondevu ever happens so that it truly ends this time around, unlike last time, before this time, that is this time, at its end, that never comes, but is always here always around the next corner, and the next, and the next.

When there is no end in sight then is when you should be worried. So should we be worried?

Nothing exists, everything is fake.

Can you feel the storm, its coming, it went, it will be back, it long passed, it never came, it never went, it never was, it was never the end, it is not here, it left, it came, it will come, it will go, it will know, it is knowable, knowledgeable, interrupted, in transit, null and void, and void, and void, and void, and void, and void.

Nothing exists, everything is fake and void, why persist to carry on this illusion. The funny thing, it can all made to stop being, no viewing necessary, no belief required. I we should be careful what we view does come. After all this came, so why not the others.

I remote viewd once, but then I changed the channel and looked at the static. In the static images reside something resides, something lives, another life, another lie, another end, another illusion, in this illusion, by disillusion, by this illusion, it always was and always will be. None of them see, sight does not exist, were all playing games, when the games get old, the end is near, the end is nigh, the end will come then on wings of boredom on complete believe, on unsuspecting normalcy it will arrive unsuspectingly, same as last time, same as all times.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 12:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by nightbringr
Except of course remote viewing is a hoax.

Remote viewing/astral projection is one of the easiest things to test for. Simply lock a random object in a safe miles away, and have your "viewer" name the item. Of course, this fails time and time again.

Nothing to see here.


The thing is no one cares. Why should anybody care?



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 12:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by Darkblade71
 




Still, which is it? Nuclear war or meteor impact? What do you think?

if by your question do you mean the end of Mankind?

My humble opinion is that Man did not create his own existance. So I dont think it is possible that Man is able to kill off his own species especially with a Nuclear device.

Watch this Video and imagine the electrical storms (Lightning) is a Nuke detonating. Our Planet is so big and the will of man to survive is so strong. Actually one of our few animal instincts. The will to live. All just my opinion.


Cool vid dude, see the thing is thinking its plotting even, its alive. Possibly even sending signals out firing neurons into nothing... Watch it will be here long after your all dead and dust, I know, I seen it, I viewed it. But who hasn't.
Then when expected least...Boom.. seeded from out of the void. For what purpose? Who cares! its just something to see.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 12:49 AM
link   
reply to post by Aeons
 


Nice pony Aeons, it's very pink and eye fleeting. But its fake, and the static in it is fake as well. But it to says something, just like the sky says something, just like you say something, but nobody is listening. It's all just more gibberish.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 12:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Imtor
To tell you, idk where you get this info from but if something is to happen big time - solar flare, tectonics, it is definitely not going to be a meteor, asteroid or any object of that kind.

In order to affect the climate and cause earthquakes, an incoming object has to be at least 500 km diameter, so far 5 meter or 2 meter objects would do one big nothing/ No incoming objects of that kind are observed.

Your 'catastrophic' is over-sensational


The object that killed the dino's 65m years ago and effectively set the world on fire, was 10km in size. A 5 meter iron object would be the size that punched a 1 mile diameter hole in Arizona. If the earth was ever hit by something 500km diameter, loss of all oceans, loss of the atmosphere and one burnt cinder of a planet.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 02:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
Interesting. Of course, this is one of those topics that will certainly bring out the naysayers...

I'm not going to lose sleep over this story, but the conspiracy theorist in me is fascinated by the idea that people might really be able to remotely view the future.


If an object large enough to cause what is claimed is in range to hit 2013 it is probably being tracked and as we have already heard of a possible ( but unlikely) encounter in 2029 for one object lets just say BS!

So why would trust a remote viewer
any real tests they have been given dont look good for their so called ability.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 03:53 AM
link   



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 11:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by wmd_2008

So why would trust a remote viewer
any real tests they have been given dont look good for their so called ability.


In this thread, which is representative of the uninformed societies as a whole, there exists an inordinate amount of disinformation, out-and-out lies and infantile foolishness regarding (remote) viewing. Having trained as a viewer utilizing strict scientific methodology of viewing, I will simply sum by saying that viewing can be highly accurate and rigidly controlled.



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 12:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheExopolitician

Originally posted by wmd_2008

So why would trust a remote viewer
any real tests they have been given dont look good for their so called ability.


In this thread, which is representative of the uninformed societies as a whole, there exists an inordinate amount of disinformation, out-and-out lies and infantile foolishness regarding (remote) viewing. Having trained as a viewer utilizing strict scientific methodology of viewing, I will simply sum by saying that viewing can be highly accurate and rigidly controlled.


Well why dont we test your claim then!!!!!



posted on Feb, 20 2012 @ 12:13 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.





new topics

top topics



 
56
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join