Remote Viewers Predict Catastrophic Meteor Impact Before 2013, page 48


Pages: <<  45    46    47    48    49    50    51  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 56 times


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 08:24 PM by texasgirl
reply to post by stereologist



Oh, and they say this possible planet on the edge of the solar system is 4x the size of Earth. In another article, I believe they saide WISE was picking up the same thing. Isn't that alittle weird?


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:09 PM by stereologist
reply to post by texasgirl



No. The suggestion is that a hypothetical new planet called Tyche might be 4x the size of Jupiter, not Earth. That's a big difference. Also, it was suggested by those that proposed Tyche that IF it exists it should be in the WISE data. Nothing has turned up so far.


reply posted on 26-6-2012 @ 10:17 PM by stereologist
reply to post by texasgirl



My bad. You are referring to a more recent suggestion. This is another hypothetical planet. It is smaller and closer, but it never comes close to Earth.

The unseen planet would be too far away to perceptibly perturb the motions of Earth and the other inner planets, but close enough to the scattered disc objects to sway them.

This is an important concept. The Earth will be affected, but the affect is so small that today we are unable to measure it. To us it appears that there is nothing happened. An astronomer, I think his name is Iorio, determined that if a planet the size of Earth were 70AU out we would not be able to detect its affects on the Earth.

orbiting 140 billion miles

This is a big number. We are 92 million miles from the Sun. This is over 1000 times further out and it never gets close to Earth.



reply posted on 27-6-2012 @ 09:20 AM by texasgirl
reply to post by stereologist



Okay, thanks for the information. I guess after seeing Melancholia and reading this before bedtime, along with seeing these spheres on this website:

www.flickr.com...


I guess I kind of bugged out alittle. I need to take a break from all these doom and gloom threads!


reply posted on 27-6-2012 @ 11:32 AM by rebellender
Originally posted by odinson
reply to
post by rebellender



I wonder how related these guys are to the guy who did the killshot?


what guys who are you talking about?


reply posted on 30-6-2012 @ 12:39 PM by rebellender
reply to post by Yule C Mann



or you could be reading the "Greatest Hoax on Earth"

if its all about perspective, where then is truth? tangibility?



reply posted on 3-7-2012 @ 10:29 AM by mabthd
reply to post by rebellender



I enjoy your humor, but if one studies carefully the abduction phenomenon together with the regressive
hypnotic method, one can soon realize that the only effective way for civilians of obtaining informations about aliens
and their plans is analyzing the abductees' experiences. In this case the reliability of the information is not based mainly on the agreement of the scientific community about the hypnotic technique, but on the agreement and the consistency among thousands of accounts worldwide. I am reading dozens of books on the subject and recently had a discussion with dr. D. Jacobs about this issue (hope you will know who he is). If you consider all the informations and the methodologies of research available (eye witnesses' reports, psychological analyses, physical scars, etc. ), the phenomenon turns out to be absolutely REAL, no question. Period.
Moreover the abduction activity provides the only reasonable explanation for the ET presence on Earth, which in turn is definitively proved by tenths of NASA footages.

Having said that, I thoroughly agree with you that little information can be obtained by the tall beings, who never appear and are reported only by Bob Dean at A51 (as long as i know), and only slightly more information is grabbed from the grays. Dr. Jacobs confessed to me that after 40 years investigating such cases, he still is having an hard time in understanding the real plans and nature of aliens: this is a proof he is not making up the story.

In conclusion, in my opinion, the skeptics are missing the point that, while they insist on debunking certain
non-necessary conditions for proving ET presence, they neglect hundreds of other obvious SUFFICIENT proofs!
The key is combining all the research methods and linking all the available informations, otherwise one takes only what is comfortable to himself ...


reply posted on 13-7-2012 @ 07:11 PM by stereologist
reply to post by Caver78



Now in light of all the meteor hits recently, it would seem despite the debate on RV the OP's premise is possible.

The number of meteors is not increasing. There are thousands of bright meteors called fireballs each day. These appear all over the world.

The problem with the claims of the OP is that it claims catastrophic. It should be meteorite impact. A meteor is the flash of light seen in the sky.


reply posted on 14-7-2012 @ 09:57 AM by rebellender
reply to post by stereologist


There are thousands of bright meteors called fireballs each day. These appear all over the world. The problem with the claims of the OP is that it claims catastrophic.




Thousands every day? what like when a tree blows in the wind, it howls, except you were not there so how do you prove it....you mean that kind of Fireball each day?

See, you just cant grasp the concept of the OP. It hasn't happened and may not.
Could it?
Has it before?
Will it?
Face it, you dont have answers anymore than others have probables.
Live and let live.
you believe in Santa, I dont. Live and let live


reply posted on 14-7-2012 @ 10:32 AM by stereologist
reply to post by rebellender



Thousands every day? what like when a tree blows in the wind, it howls, except you were not there so how do you prove it....you mean that kind of Fireball each day?

Thousands EVERY day. Check with the AMS, the AMerican Meteor Society and learn something.

See, you just cant grasp the concept of the OP. It hasn't happened and may not.
Could it?
Has it before?
Will it?
Face it, you dont have answers anymore than others have probables.
Live and let live.
you believe in Santa, I dont. Live and let live

Once again you do nothing but scoff. You are nothing more than a scoffer and have nothing of value in your posts. Your pathetic efforts to scoff at my posts are worthless.

Had you bothered to read the post I was referring to you would have read that the post possibly suggests an increase in meteors. Not true at all. The AMS and other meteor societies report that there are thousands of fireballs a day.

Try learning what a fireball is and go from there.


reply posted on 17-7-2012 @ 12:10 PM by rebellender
reply to post by stereologist


Thousands EVERY day. Check with the AMS, the AMerican Meteor Society and learn something.



an even greater chance of an event such as the OP suggests!


Once again you do nothing but scoff. You are nothing more than a scoffer and have nothing of value in your posts. Your pathetic efforts to scoff at my posts are worthless.

you sure you want to bring this topic up with anybody on the 2012 Thread Topic....um post history tells the tails

see ya,

oh yeah, thanks for the page count
edit on 17-7-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  45    46    47    48    49    50    51  >>    ^^TOP^^



Pane andov - expected cosmic events in 2012-2013
  Posted 8 days ago with 9 member flags
Near Earth Asteroid Sept 14 2012
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags
Let\'s take a look at the PoleShift/PlanetX doomsayers, shall we?
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
2012 Is not the End.
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags