The problem I have is, you have ignored the basics of what it might be based on.
So How I can proceed further with an explanation, you deny the basics of the big bang and the humans nervous system?
Not only do you have no clue how crap works you want to be the judge and jury as to what is part of the conversation and what is not. Every conversation you have had on ATS to date has been based on this method of communication.
EVERY one. it is a shame but you come off as the wannabe skeptic with no professional hopes
I challenged you to run the experiment yourself... You said that it is not your deal to prove anything rv'ers have to... You asked for evidence and refused to do what was offered... Your a lazy fraud at that.
Have your ran any of the test yourself according to the list procedures. You ask for proof, I told you the easiest most undeniable proof was to run the exact experiments that where ran with RV...
Theres your proof those test your afraid to RUN....
Thanks for the update on conversation. There is no way to convince people. One can only offer information and let people do with it what they want. But good luck with the discussions.
listen you know nothing about the subject matter.... (two of yourMISTAKES )
"NASA has nothing to do with this prediction"
"I could tell by glancing over the abstract that is was false"
If you can not answer the question of if you believe in the Scientific method how can understand the experimental process
if you do not answer the question of if you believe in the big bang how could you possibly understand more complicated subjects like modern electronics
If you do not answer the question of if you believe in entropy how you can you be expected to understand information theory
If you cant understand modern information theory how can you understand the solution that was used for modern electronic communications
If you cant understand the big bang theory how can you hope to get to modern quantum entanglement
With out the experimental process,entanglement, information theory, and modern electronics how can you even hope to learn the basics of CRV at a beginners level (please note I did skip a few things)
(art, sculpting, writing, learning theories, behavioral modification, information analysis among others)
Without the same above, how can you hope do debunk as a pseudo-skeptic????
Remote Viewers Predict Catastrophic Meteor Impact Before 2013
A prediction or forecast is a statement about the way things will happen in the future, often but not always based on experience or knowledge. While there is much overlap between prediction and forecast, a prediction may be a statement that some outcome is expected, while a forecast may cover a range of possible outcomes.
An impact event is the collision of a large meteorite, asteroid, comet, or other celestial object with the Earth or another planet. Throughout recorded history, hundreds of minor impact events (and exploding bolides) have been reported, with some occurrences causing deaths, injuries, property damage or other significant localised consequences. There have also been major impact events throughout Earth's history which severely disrupted the environment and caused mass extinctions.
a sudden and widespread disaster
I do not address off topic issues that you try to interject into the thread.
Swann's Jupiter rings
Ingo Swann proposed a study to Targ and Puthoff. At first they resisted, for the resulting descriptions would be impossible to verify. Yet, on the evening 27 April 1973 Targ and Puthoff recorded Swann's remote viewing session of the planet Jupiter and Jupiter's moons, prior to the Voyager probe's visit there in 1979.
Swann asked for 30 minutes of silence. According to Swann, his ability to see Jupiter took about 3-and-a-half minutes. In the session he made several reports on the physical features of Jupiter, such as its surface, atmosphere and weather. Swann's statement that Jupiter had planetary rings, like Saturn, was controversial at the time. The Voyager probe later confirmed the existence of the rings.
The following are Swann's exact statements:
6:06:20 "Very high in the atmosphere there are crystals... they glitter. Maybe the stripes are like bands of crystals, maybe like rings of Saturn, though not far out like that. Very close within the atmosphere."(Unintelligible sentence.) "I bet you they'll reflect radio probes. Is that possible if you had a cloud of crystals that were assaulted by different radio waves?" 
Hey newbie, each and every point is involved in the matter of Remote viewing. Not my fault you know nothing of the subject... Reminds me a virgin trying to give players advice on women....
Again you prove you have no QUALIFICATIONS
with out qualifications you can not determine what is on topic... and what is not..
Each and every thing I have posted has been relevant to the thread... Everything.... the discussion is over
sorry these are your rules not mine...
If you do this again I'll be forced to pull a stereofraud and report you to the mods for offtopic discussion.
NASA not being an agency in charge of space objects? really dude
Big Bang not a scientific discovery????
Remote Viewers Predict Catastrophic Meteor Impact Before 2013
I do ... your apparently not smart enough to realize it... not my problem...
You are to afraid to respond to how each part is off topic... Again you offer no proof... being rude is uncalled for mam
How is the structure of the universe of topic for the science of Remote Viewing ?
How is parts of the human body off topic when the Science deals with humans?
How is information theory off-topic?
You after all said NASA had nothing to do with this thread...One of you four big mistakes... not to mention you offer no proof of lies..... Scientific Proof
If you can not provide the scientific proof you demanded you will get none.
So you are lost on what NASA covers...
I think you are trying to bury your mistake when you stated that NASA had nothing to do with this thread... In fact you also have stated that it is off-topic
Stereologist- four mistakes total
or is is four Lies.....
I cant outline things any simpler....
Please keep your post on topic... and remember ATS is about denying *snip*...oops I mean ignorance