 |
|
Topic started on 17-9-2004 @ 03:12 PM by lacan
|
Look at this pic from the Clementine Lunar Image Browser:
www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...
ude=311&submit=Use+Lat%252FLong&sensor=UVVIS&filter=415_nm
external image
Am I seeing things, or is there a large, rectangular structure in about the center of this photo? The scale is at 1 pixel for every kilometer. This
thing is huge!
What is this and how did it get there?
[edit on 17-9-2004 by lacan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:21 PM by SmokeyTheBear
|
Your right. What is that. Whatever it is its HUGE!!!!!!!!! Suprised they dont mention it in the text above. Defintely not a crater.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:22 PM by Imspicy
|
Ahh.....that just a 20 x 28 mile completely unnatural rectangular object.
Move along....nothing to see here.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:24 PM by Spiderj
|
I'm certainly not an expert on this sort of thing but it really is one of the more interesting moon pictures I've seen.
I know there's someone on here more than capable of figuring out what the heck that thing is.
Nice find.
Spiderj
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:26 PM by SmokeyTheBear
|
Lets blame it on the commies and get on with life
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:32 PM by kinglizard
|
Ok now that's interesting. The image below was cropped sharpened twice and blown up to 420%.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:35 PM by SmokeyTheBear
|
NOw it looks more natural.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:40 PM by Spiderj
|
Nicely done KL.
What the hell is dat ting?
It's always tough to tell stuff like this but I have to say it really is an intriguing little bugger.
I know there has to be some sort of photographic or moon type expert lurking around here somewhere that should be able to shed some light on this.
SPiderj
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:42 PM by Gazrok
|
 derived from data 
Meaning its a mosaic of compiled images. We've seen this before in other space pictures of planets, etc. people. It's simply a light/dark
difference between that section of the photo and surrounding sections.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:43 PM by kinglizard
|
Nature can’t produce right angles from erosion or other forces, let alone 4 right angles. I’m baffled.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:46 PM by SmokeyTheBear
|
You're both right it does look like somethin with four right angles, that have been eroded a little, but it also could be caused by shadows and stuff
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:51 PM by kinglizard
|
Yeah but shadows from what, 4 right angled structures? I mean to say to cast these shadows wouldn’t you need structures that take on the shape of the
shadow?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:53 PM by SmokeyTheBear
|
your right. hey load a picture of the american flag in black and white and place it near the rectangl. then we could say its an american moon colony.
lol. But your are right youd need four right angles to make the shadow
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:53 PM by nathraq
|
Who owns the Clementine Satellite?
MAybe somebody should contact them, and hear what kind of excuse they will give for it......
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 03:56 PM by Spiderj
|
Meaning its a mosaic of compiled images

Wouldn't that explain the sharp lines, the lining up of the individual frames to make the "mosaic".
Just a question as I don't know enough about photo-imaging to really have an opinion.
I do think it safe to say the lines weren't made by water and whatever breezes may occur in the tiny atmosphere of the moon I would think "winds"
at least winds strong enough to carve deep ridges happen on the moon.
Though I could definitely be wrong, not an expert.
Spiderj
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 04:04 PM by kinglizard
|
If it was caused by creating a mosaic form dozens of images wouldn’t we see many more anomalies in the image? I have created mosaics in Photoshop and
even that publicly available piece of software doesn’t make these types of marks or mistakes. I am having a difficult time understanding and believing
the mosaic explanation.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 04:08 PM by Spiderj
|
If it was caused by creating a mosaic form dozens of images wouldn’t we see many more anomalies in the image?

Good point. Can you pop up (if it's not too much trouble) a photo-shopped mosaic thingy for comparison?
Spiderj
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 04:14 PM by worldwatcher
|
quick someone contact Richard Hoagland, he'll know what it is, he's been saying there's stuff on the moon all along.
seriously though, great find, i have no explanation of what that rectangle thing could possibly be.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 04:15 PM by kinglizard
|
Here is one from NASA, I don’t think it shares any similarities with the image posted in this thread. You can see a line on the stitched images but it
doesn’t have any width like a wall it’s just a line caused from differing grey values in the two images.
external image
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-9-2004 @ 04:26 PM by enrage
|
so that rectangle might be the 'alleged' secret moon base??
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |