It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As if we don't have enough homeless children and children living in foster homes already. This bill will FORCE women who don't want to have a child (even rape victims) to keep that child. It's absolutely ridiculous!
That's your opinion and I respect your right to believe it. I disagree, however, and see abortion as no different than any other act of murder.
I guess that's what makes this issue and this legislation so contentious.
§ 4. The laws of this Commonwealth shall be interpreted and construed to acknowledge on behalf of the unborn child at every stage of development all the rights, privileges, and immunities available to other persons, citizens, and residents of this Commonwealth, subject only to the Constitution of the United States and decisional interpretations thereof by the United States Supreme Court and specific provisions to the contrary in the statutes and constitution of this Commonwealth.
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
This issue is not as simple as "women's rights to choose."
It all depends upon your definition of human life. For many, abortion is the murder of an unborn baby. To them, it's the same thing as killing a newborn baby would be...it's killing a person. We would never allow someone to kill a newborn, no matter what the circumstances. To many, there is no difference between a newborn and the unborn.
You may not agree with that definition of life, but for those that feel that life exists at conception, it is a real issue.
If you mean consciousness, then there is some debate over that, as well. Brain waves first become detectable at around 16 weeks development, so a fetus cannot possibly have consciousness before then.* However, it is unlikely that there could be a full consciousness for some weeks after that; it's generally only after week 20 or so that the fetus responds to sounds and has a startle reflex, and the brain waves which *can* be detected at this point are most like the brainwaves that are displayed during deep sleep or dream states.
Even after a baby is born, the first few months are likely to be very fuzzy and unfocused. This represents a very rapid period of brain growth, with synaptic connections being formed every day. During this period of time, however, the senses (especially vision) are still maturing, and almost everything in a baby's brain is focused around immediate sensory input, and making it into something relatively stable and coherent. It is nothing at all like the consciousness displayed by adults or even older children -- however, it is a form of consciousness. At this point it just comes down to individuals arguing over definitions.
---------------
Side note: Almost every pro-life website and resource on the planet carries the claim that brain activity is detectable in week 6, or at around 40 days. This is based on a single paper which was published in 1964, which claimed to have measured EEG activity in the fetus at day 40 (H. Hamlin, "Life or Death by EEG," JAMA, Oct. 12, 1964). What is not mentioned is that this paper was discredited very soon after by some medical students who, using the same equipment and setup, measured brainwaves in a bowl of Jell-o.
It is, in fact, not possible for there to be brain waves at 6 weeks because there is not yet a "brain"; the embryo at week 6 is generally about an inch long and wouldn't even fill a teaspoon, and the cells which will become the brain have not yet differentiated to neurons and glia, there are no synapses or dendrites (thus no possibility of synaptic connections), and the fetus is producing no neurotransmitters at this stage. In reality, this claim has to be disregarded; there is no physical structure present which would allow brain waves to exist.
Read more: When do babies/fetuses get a conscience? (is that how u spell it?) | Answerbag www.answerbag.com...
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
I just read the bill in question on the websited linked from the article, and it said nothing about contraceptives...
Originally posted by beezzer
*shakes fist*
Curse you! Curse you pesky little 10th Ammendment that allows states to choose. Curse the laws that give freedom to people in states to determine what laws they'll have!
We just need to get rid of the whole damned constitution right now!
What were these people thinking!?!?!?!?!
Are they trying to self-determine or something?
Originally posted by DelMarvel
Originally posted by beezzer
*shakes fist*
Curse you! Curse you pesky little 10th Ammendment that allows states to choose. Curse the laws that give freedom to people in states to determine what laws they'll have!
We just need to get rid of the whole damned constitution right now!
What were these people thinking!?!?!?!?!
Are they trying to self-determine or something?
It looks like they're trying to politically self-destruct anyway. Unless they have some magical plan to win statewide without Northern Virginia.
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
For everyone who thinks that an unborn child doesn't count as a living "person", then what about the times people are punished for killing a pregnant woman, and they get 2 counts of murder against them...both the mother and the unborn child?
To me, we can't have it both ways. We shouldn't be able to selectively consider an unborn child to be a "life" when it is convenient to us.
Originally posted by Thingol
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Those who are pro life will applaud this legislation. Those who are pro choice will criticize it. Obviously, this is a very polarizing issue and the legislation will no doubt be challenged in the courts.
For the record, I am a firm believer that life begins at conception and that all, above all else, have the right to life.
I fully agree.....
What I don't understand is......how is that a belief? To me it's fact. Can someone explain how life doesn't begin at conception??.....I can't see the other side of this coin at all
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
For everyone who thinks that an unborn child doesn't count as a living "person", then what about the times people are punished for killing a pregnant woman, and they get 2 counts of murder against them...both the mother and the unborn child?
To me, we can't have it both ways. We shouldn't be able to selectively consider an unborn child to be a "life" when it is convenient to us.
Unfortunately, though, it IS all about convenience, isn't it?
Originally posted by AnonymousCitizen
Those who are pro life will applaud this legislation. Those who are pro choice will criticize it.