ATS RECAP 22: Obama Guns Down UFO, page 1

Can Obama really ban guns to citizens of America? Or is Wayne La-Pierre CEO of the NRA using his speech at the Conservative Action Political Conference as a tool to increase memberships? UFOs and Government acknowledgment of their existence or lack there of. Many interesting stories this year have sparked much debate. Which story made you believe? Or do you still think this is all too ridiculous? Reach out to my twitter account @ATSRecapBryan to get more insights as I continue to stay updated on the stories.




Thread Obama vows to outlaw guns if re-elected...

Response Member Ixtab Response

Response Member ICEKOHLD Response

Thread Massive Obama conspiracy to kill the Second Amendment

Video NRA EVP and CEO Wayne LaPierre - Speech to CPAC 2011-Washington, DC

Thread As U.K. Releases UFO Files, Former UFO Project Chief Apologizes For 'Spin And Dirty Tricks'

Thread Petition, UFOs, White House and Lies - A Rebuttal By Stanton Friedman

Thread Air Force UFO rules disappear after inquiry

Thread Roswell a 'Soviet plot to create panic in U.S: (Time to Deny Ignorance Or...)

Thread NSA releases UFO documents online. We are not alone!

Thread JFK demanded UFO files from CIA 10 days before assassination?

Thread Betty & Barney Hill Hypnotic Regression Recordings?

Thread Some of the Most Mysterious, Scariest and Outstanding Cases of Alien Abduction Ever!

reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com

---

Like the title.

Got a funny picture in my head with it.

reply to post by josephamccoy

---

It is not just you.

Originally posted by XXXN3O
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com

---

Like the title.

Got a funny picture in my head with it.

hahaha me too! I picture obama on a battleship manning a huge anti-aircraft gun shooting at a UFO as it goes down

reply to post by josephamccoy

---

Same to me,but maybe someone can give us narrative story of the vid,will be great.

I'm getting the same error.

Seems to work on youtube though for anyone interested:

reply to post by Rising Against

---

reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com

---

if you want to ban guns you'll have to ban all shovels, picks, axes, and other implements that can be used to make tank traps. if you want to take guns away it won't stop the gang members from obtaining them. this is america, not europe where the citizens will merrily prance into the showers. nope banning guns means you'll fill a lot of body bags. guns kill in the hands of a shooter, so do forks knives, sticks, boat oars, gasoline in a jar, a well practised wing chun practioner, ted bundy used blunt every day instruments, like tire irons, baseballbats, etc. a gun is in most cases more humane sanitary, certain and accurate than a sledge hammer. same result farther distance

reply to post by SaturnFX

---

I really love the recaps, however if you'll permit a suggestion? The flash strobing background is the kind that can induce epileptic seizures. Could you consider toning it down? Thanks,

Originally posted by aboutface
reply to post by SaturnFX

---

I really love the recaps, however if you'll permit a suggestion? The flash strobing background is the kind that can induce epileptic seizures. Could you consider toning it down? Thanks,

erm...no?

oh, right, you meant to reply to the ops verses me..

unless you are all up on my hypnotoad..
in which case...all hail hypnotoad!

Originally posted by SaturnFX

Originally posted by aboutface
reply to post by SaturnFX

---

I really love the recaps, however if you'll permit a suggestion? The flash strobing background is the kind that can induce epileptic seizures. Could you consider toning it down? Thanks,

erm...no?

oh, right, you meant to reply to the ops verses me..

unless you are all up on my hypnotoad..
in which case...all hail hypnotoad!

So sorry. SFX. You're right. I did mean the OP.

reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com

---

Hi Bryan,

I am very torn by your question regarding the best story given my personal experience with and ultimate belief in UFOs. However, I sincerely believe the threats posed to our gun rights, and as another subject altogether to the Constitution are real.

The individual rights conferred by the Second Amendment and guaranteed by our Constitution have been under constant attack for many years. I would suggest that any President since the sixties to current day could hardly throw a rock out a White House window without hitting an anti-gun group.

I also believe only through the diligence of gun owners, particular representatives, the NRA and certain Presidents have the anti-gun efforts been defended against.

Any interested person can find there are enumerable restrictive laws, bans and restrictions on the private purchase and ownership of gun as to be so numerous as to defy mentioning in this post.

In case someone has never read my posts or discussed the topic of the Second Amendment with me personally, I want it to be crystal clear. I am on record in the written word and in personal conversations that I no longer support either the donkeys or the elephants. Both parties long ago outlived their usefulness as the overlapping centrist agenda and hypocrisy of both parties is unbearable.

My personal agenda in this case is clear, I support and protect the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, and the individual rights conferred within it.

I would agree there is currently no direct attack on the Second Amendment per se, and I find it unlikely any President, Mr. Obama or those to come in the near future will attempt what would be a futile, full frontal attack on the Second Amendment. As long as the Constitution remains safe, but that although associated is a subject for another thread.

A direct attack is futile because of the 2008 decision by SCOTUS, who in their wisdom ruled clearly and concisely on the rights conferred by the Second Amendment of the Constitution in the decision; District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia [1][2] and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Additionally, the Court enumerated several longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession that it found were consistent with the Second Amendment.[3] In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment limits state and local governments to the same extent that it limits the federal government.[4]

LOL.. I am very verbose on this subject so I must post the second half following this post.

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: