It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chemtrail plane over NJ 11/14/10

page: 3
8
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Gmoneycricket
 



Do you have proof a calibrated eye that all contrails are normal looking?

Jiminy Cricket! You had better get your eyes checked! I said absolutely nothing about what is normal, or what is not.

Contrails don't give a damn about our perception of what is normal, and they will always appear EXACTLY as they should, under the circumstances in which they exist.

Because you seem too daft to understand it:
"See ya" is often used instead of "I'll see you later". In other words, it's a way of saying good bye. It is most definitely not an indication of superior eyesight. This is especially true in my case. I've been blind in my left eye since I was 16. Currently the corrected vision in my "good eye" is about 20/100.

So...:
See ya,
Milt
edit on 15-2-2012 by BenReclused because: Typo




posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Gmoneycricket
 

I think water and some expected engine exhaust is acceptable....those both are chemicals.

Nothing beyond that has been proven to escape a plane's wake.

edit on 15-2-2012 by EyeDontKnow because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-2-2012 by EyeDontKnow because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
So you defense is,
I do not understand what the chemtrail conspiracy is about?


ther is no "defence" because there is no issue about water being a chemical.



So from your post, discount these chemicals, as noted,
but any other people that claim chemicals are,
false rumors?


A nonsensical question - contrails are water.

chemtrails are supposedly something other than contrails therefore something other than water.


So you guys get to decide which chemicals are acceptable?[/quoet]

no - we get to say that you harping on about water being chemtrails is just trolling.



I want to understand as you describe, we get to use these chemicals,
but any you think you might see,
is just fantasy.

Oh that makes perfect sense to me.
Not!


Indeed - your whole post makes no sense.


edit on 15-2-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


And as far as the B2 Contrail chemicals
I have never seen you guys post ,
How many chemicals,
and what kind,
and how many years,
and which planes, these tests were conducted on?

And we all know it was secret, will be your response,
and then you claim,

I know they are not running any secret tests with planes at this time.

Prove it
You Said It
so many times,
I know your response.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:47 PM
link   
Well that didn't take long for the name calling to begin now did it?


I would like to make a suggestion here if it is okay with the chemtrail believers, but then again I don't need their permission so here you go..

My suggestion is that if you want to do something productive here prove that chemtrails exist,because that seems to be the one thing that you are never able to provide when asked why is that?


Now I find it funny that not even 2 seconds into the first video the man even calls it right as he says they are contrails hell he debunked himself before the video even gets going good.


So now answer me this,please, how can one say it's a contrail and then decide it is a chemtrail coming from the same plane?


Let's see here this looks alot like these...



Just goes to show you how uninformed people are about how the weather reacts to plane exhaust..As for the second video that has already been handled by other members on here..Good try but just not good enough I am sorry to say..



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:47 PM
link   
Why even respond to me,
if I do not know what a
Chemtrail conspiracy is then.
Just my water statement has to struck down.
It proves you have an agenda,
no one would need to defend water coming out of the back of a plane.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


And as far as the B2 Contrail chemicals
I have never seen you guys post ,
How many chemicals,
and what kind,
and how many years,
and which planes, these tests were conducted on?


Have you ?
Do you have the proof ?


Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
And we all know it was secret, will be your response,
and then you claim,

I know they are not running any secret tests with planes at this time.

Prove it
You Said It
so many times,
I know your response.

No one has said such a thing.
"I know they are not running any secret tests with planes at this time."

...because if it's secret, than how would anyone know ?....you, me, or anyone ?



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:53 PM
link   
Just admit it,
over populated areas of this planet,
you are blocking our sunlight for a profit,
and you feel the need to defend it as your right, as you know it.
You work for the airlines,
sales are down,
now the clowns on the ground,
are demanding,
their fair share of sunlight.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gmoneycricket
......
Just my water statement has to struck down.
It proves you have an agenda,
no one would need to defend water coming out of the back of a plane.




You are adding words to our (my) voices.
Water comes out of hot engines....whether you can see it or not.
Please mark that down as an acknowledgement.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:54 PM
link   
reply to post by MathiasAndrew
 


What do pictures of yourself being posted have anything to do with this thread?


Again you seem to want to wander as far away from a debate as possible. May I suggest you stay on topic and there are many other sites you can post pics of yourself, but this isn't one of them. Now if you did it with the so called dreaded chemtrails behind you then that would be a different story.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 09:58 PM
link   
So are,
Man Made Cirrus Clouds Harmless?

You offer no proof
just claim your spraying of water and normal pollution is acceptable.
and to question that, is not acceptable, if we don't like your answer.


edit on 15-2-2012 by Gmoneycricket because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-2-2012 by Gmoneycricket because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Gmoneycricket
 





Just my water statement has to struck down. It proves you have an agenda, no one would need to defend water coming out of the back of a plane.


I don't think it is an agenda,but more like educating. Something that chemtrailers have a hard time grasping onto.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:12 PM
link   
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
 


So you have been deemed the educator,
self appointed?


Please finish what that means,
so I understand how someone can be chosen to educate,
and the rest have to accept as fact?

That would be like me saying
I am quality control of
The Debunkers
here to question
and see how you guys are doing on the job.
Don't want waste tax dollars do we?



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Gmoneycricket
 





You work for the airlines, sales are down, now the clowns on the ground, are demanding, their fair share of sunlight.


Could you do me a favor and tell the airline that we all work for that they need to start catching up on some back pay,because I have yet to see a dime from them and I suspect some others haven't either..


Now as far as the clowns on the ground here are a few pics that you probably won't like but here you go anyways..









Notice something in those pics, if you said contrails then you win the good boy trophy,because they are only contrails being left by ordinary planes and nothing more.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:18 PM
link   
So,
How are these guys doing on their
Performance Review?

Have they be able to convince you,

Man Made Cirrus Clouds are Harmless?



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
 


No
That is plane exhaust,
which is pollution!
You can worship it, and admire it,
but don't force it on me!



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Gmoneycricket
 





So you have been deemed the educator, self appointed?


I see reading comprehension isn't your best skill, because you commented on agendas and I just said he isn't doing this for an agenda it is more like educating. So where in my post did I say I was appointed as the educator? If your going to reply to my post at least understand what I said first. Amazing how you seem to see only what you want to see and then post replies out of context.



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Gmoneycricket
 





You work for the airlines, sales are down, now the clowns on the ground, are demanding, their fair share of sunlight.


Could you do me a favor and tell the airline that we all work for that they need to start catching up on some back pay,because I have yet to see a dime from them and I suspect some others haven't either..


Now as far as the clowns on the ground here are a few pics that you probably won't like but here you go anyways..









Notice something in those pics, if you said contrails then you win the good boy trophy,because they are only contrails being left by ordinary planes and nothing more.


That would be like me taking pictures of my smoking car, and bragging about them.
Have you guys seen any pictures on ATS of,

Hey this is my car, leaving water vapor trails, on a cold humid day, during warm up.
Lets just look at where these guys minds are at.


edit on 15-2-2012 by Gmoneycricket because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by pshea38
youtube vid# = Bvv9TGS22fA
What are the possible explanations for this phenomena?
Is it time we all invested in a high power torches?

edit on 14-2-2012 by pshea38 because: (no reason given)

We can't tell the circumstances under which the video was shot.
Maybe it was dust, maybe it was light rain/mist.

High-powered beam lights shot across a dark background will usually highlight any particles flying by.
But the question is.....what are they ?
Are these "mysterious orbs" from another dimension ?
Why are such dust particles given another name, when thought of in another conspiracy ?
www.youtube.com...
edit on 15-2-2012 by EyeDontKnow because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 15 2012 @ 10:44 PM
link   
I work in hollywood productions a lot. When the lighting guys send a beam of light across a dark background. you see all the dust in the air....it's just a highlighted occurance of the dust in the air.
....and this is INDOORS when I see this....with the closed stage doors for hours.
edit on 15-2-2012 by EyeDontKnow because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
8
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join