If what all these UFO people say is true then the original files don't even exist.
Why would the government allow to exist files that would incriminate them?
If your intent is to keep something secret, as the UFO people argue, then you destroy.
They can't alter the present, but they can rewrite history, if they're the ones that pull the strings. And they generally are. They're the ones that
get the reports. Look at Blue Book. People were supposed to send reports to Blue Book through various official channels. If the government wanted to
rewrite history then this is how they'd do it. If a crash happens or something that's outside their property then they can secure it militarily and
slap a National Security label on it so that they, once again, are in control of the information.
I consider it nearly impossible that our government could keep something like this secret without the lid blowing off. So the only possible conclusion
is that there's a superior power involved. Everyone knows that humans are clumsy. We couldn't keep this secret. But maybe it's not humans that're
keeping it secret.
What if I turned all this around and said that humans created the UFOs. Would we still fail at keeping it secret? Very likely and plausible! For
instance, we were only able to keep the SR-71 secret for years, not several decades. Same for most any other skunkworks project. While we could better
predict crashes of man-made craft and therefore more easily contain them, we certainly can't know what every person on earth is doing (to prevent big
leaks). Someone would have made a mistake by now. We would know that our government absolutely has built craft that greatly exceed conventional limits
of all sorts. Switching it around so that instead of alien UFOs they're human UFOs doesn't change the results much at all.
Either humans have somehow imagined UFO history or a higher power is influencing things. One that can play with our minds like children play with
toys. One that can prevent a full disclosure from happening.
Which do you think is more likely? It depends. Is there a superior intelligence? How could it be invisible? That's a great question. Maybe it's more
sensible to assume UFO history is all imagined. Who can say?
You see, one can not say that partial disclosure proves they have not completely kept it secret and therefore a higher power is unneeded. But, on hte
contrary, it might be that the partial disclosure did not happen and hte evidence can be put into question. Alternatively, it might be that a partial
disclosure is impossible without a full disclosure. I believe that a partial disclosure has not happened because if it did then we would have a full
disclosure soon after. The reason I think this is because you cannot shut up people. They like to talk. The truth would get out and spread like
viruses. It would be unstoppable.
edit on 14-2-2012 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)