reply to post by TheCommentator
Oh its war is it, but why is it called terrorism if a Palestinians attacks an Israeli?
George Washington was a terrorist. Who cares about the title?
And using that logic I assume you think the holocaust was justified and not wrong aswell?
Justifiable and wrong are separate terms. War is wrong, therefore what happens in war is wrong. Justice is irrelevant in
war. It is only
justifiable in what you do after war, and why you declare it.
There is no war just a sick group of people hell bent on genocide because they want to steal peoples land.
Name me a country that wasn't founded by stealing land. The act of stealing land is as irrelevant to sovereignty as you can get.
The entire population is not brought up to hate, that’s incredibly ignorant. How would you feel if I said every single Jew hates Palestinians?
At this point, this is probably more true than false, if not for the fact that the education system, I assume because it is western, is secular in
Well considering they are blowing up innocent civilians they would have to have a lot of hate speech in their area, but internationally they do a
different type of manipulation. They use political action and lobbying to justify killing people rather than speech.
Why lobby for something that has no profit?
Iran is defending itself; if someone was continually punching you in the face you would say something too.
I would if I was getting punched in the face before I was saying things. Not to sound incredibly ignorant, but Iran's government is culturally
derived from French high culture. And that culture is one of extreme douchebaggery, snugness, and self righteousness. The difference between Iran's
theocracy culture and that of some aspects of France are laughably similar.
Israel is the king of hate, everything they do is hate filled and they use ww2 as an excuse to kill thousands of people. It’s sick that you or
anyone would support such crap, if you actually know all the facts.
I don't see how. They usually don't do much to Palestine until rockets hit them. Even with Lebanon, they never intervened in the government
collapse, and damn near ignore lots of opportunities to take over Lebanon.
Not that I think Israel is much good for not being hateful. Just a crap tone more trustworthy than a mob with rockets and guns.
So 1st option is support millions of innocent people being slaughtered, 2nd option is support millions of innocent people being slaughtered and 3rd
option is support millions of innocent people being slaughtered. That says it all doesn’t it.
Depends on what million. Japan slaughtering a million Chinese did nothing in WW2. America slaughtering a million Germans ended the war.
The slaughter of life is what war is all about. Slashing and dashing like an idiot, however, is far less efficient than the tactical an strategic
surgical cuts that slaughter specific millions of people that ends a conflict.
War, in ever way shape and form, is the architecture of death. The design of a well orchestrated cut through a population. The removal of mass with
reason and purpose to make the remainder of greater worth.
Just as architecture that randomly cuts is inherently less worthy than architecture that cuts stone with reason and purpose, war that kills
specifically certain groups is more effective to an ends than launching a bunch of missiles randomly at people.
You can say the wholesale slaughter of a population is evil. It is, in fact, just that. However war is evil, and what one does in war is irrelevant in
the face of the fact that you are, in fact, at war. So if you're going to be evil for a time to accomplish something, you might as well be tactical
To these ends, Israel was far better than Palestine. And to my ends, the slaughter of untold millions in the tactical removal of objects of symbolic
worship, undeniable does a great deal more damage than anything else to the ends of fanaticism.