It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The military's so-called Massive Ordnance Penetrator, a 30,000-pound bunker buster bomb, requires an "urgent" upgrade, according to Pentagon officials who are trying to ensure that 20 of the bombs are battle-ready -- possibly for use against Iran, though officials have been tight-lipped on potential targets.
The Air Force developed the bomb in conjunction with Boeing to attack concrete bunkers and tunnel facilities, and the Pentagon has requested $81 million in reallocated funds from Congress to get it ready for use.
Defense appropriators on Capitol Hill agreed to the request on Wednesday, just one month after Iran announced it would begin uranium enrichment at a hardened underground facility near the city of Qom in the Fardow mountain range. The tunneled facility is thought to be beyond the range of the bunker buster in question -- the largest non-nuclear weapon in the U.S. Air Force's arsenal.
Originally posted by EmceeTrick
It would be funny if Iran wasn't enriching anything, and just putting it out there to make USA waste bombs
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I think what is in the pipeline are Iranian tunnelers and they're busy tunneling. Qom was at 295 feet, the best I can find estimates. Our 30,000lbs Bunker Buster stops at about 200 feet of reinforced concrete and a staggeringly short 125 feet of solid rock. It seems the Iranians are currently able to stand deep down in their base facility and give Obama the raspberries until they're blue in the face...nothing Dear Leader can do but pout and cuss...,or nuke 'em. Nukes by us will likely get nukes used ON US, so I don't see that happening.
So.. I'd say it's understandable that the Pentagon is rushing off to build even bigger bombs. 50,000lbs? 100,000 lbs? How big will be enough?? When they reach the largest bomb man can physically transport, the Iranians will just laugh, spit and dig another 100 feet beyond the reach of THAT one. Oh...the games are enough to just give up some days.
Just think.. We get to pay for every bit of this too!
Originally posted by buddha
So they are spending $81 million
to upgrade 20 bombs ?
my god how much did the cost to make in the first places?
they are just very very strong rockets that don't blow up when they hit the ground.
Originally posted by tehdouglas
Yeah but if the bunker buster can hit 200 feet through concrete, couldnt they drop another one ontop after to hit them even further down?
Low-radioactive yield "tactical" nuclear warheads would be the only sure-fire way to destroy such deeply buried installations. The use of such weapons in any first strike was once considered taboo, 'is that still the case'? i just don't know the answer to that to be honest. But if they do go ahead and attack Iran, these are the only weapons capable of the doing the job right, so they have to be thinking of using them right?
Our 30,000lbs Bunker Buster stops at about 200 feet of reinforced concrete and a staggeringly short 125 feet of solid rock.
Originally posted by Atzil321
Low-radioactive yield "tactical" nuclear warheads would be the only sure-fire way to destroy such deeply buried installations. The use of such weapons in any first strike was once considered taboo, 'is that still the case'? i just don't know the answer to that to be honest. But if they do go ahead and attack Iran, these are the only weapons capable of the doing the job right, so they have to be thinking of using them right?
Our 30,000lbs Bunker Buster stops at about 200 feet of reinforced concrete and a staggeringly short 125 feet of solid rock.