posted on Feb, 18 2012 @ 08:49 PM
reply to post by W3RLIED2
Wellllllllllllllllll . . . I can sort of understand your perspective . . .
It is more than a little wearying to have sooooooooo much absolutely absurd stuff thrown out as valid stuff when it's not even hanging on so much as
a skyhook of evidence.
On the other hand, with different fingers . . .
I'd rather have the absurd be able to post--though preferably without all the self-righteous name calling--than miss out on a useful puzzle piece
because folks knew they'd get flamed for not being drenched in 'hard proof' . . . whatever that is.
AS my boss--who had the world's best private collection of pre-Hitler booklets, posters, broadsides, leaflets etc. from Germany . . . asserted . . .
it was the flakiest groups that FIRST AND MOST ACCURATELY
identified who Hitler was, what he would become and what he would do.
Folks just do not seem to appreciate the great import of that.
How could it be otherwise when information is even moderately controlled by the wealthy and the powerful?
So, personally--let it all hang out. I'm capable of sorting and sifting puzzle pieces according to my own criteria and experiences. That's good
enough for me. I'd rather do that than have someone else censor what puzzle pieces I see.
Or than even have someone else SELF-CENSOR because they didn't want to put up with the hostility so common for those who haven't proven every word
and phrase in a court of law. Sigh.