It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hollow Earth Theory Using Cold Fusion as evidence of the possiblity.

page: 2
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Starchild23

Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by Starchild23
 


You lack of a basic understanding of Cold Fusion would explain your skepticism. These ideas will bring about free energy. Go educate yourself on cold fusion, using your own thoughts not what modern # science has programmed you to think.


You lack a basic understand of solar behavior. Two suns will NOT chase themselves around in a space the size of Earth. The heat signatures and fusion results would be clearly evident in the soil.

The fact we've found no indication of such activity says you're imaginative...nothing more.


and not to mention the gravity of something dense enough to be a star would pull the earth right into it from such a close distance.




posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:34 PM
link   
reply to post by tpaine1809
 


I have seen you in a video where you're wearing a tank top....and wearing it very nicely I might add.

To the other members...I think he means he isn't taken seriously because he's young and hot.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:35 PM
link   
reply to post by biggmoneyme
 


No I am saying until you can prove me wrong with your own research then how credible are you? That is my point. I am not saying I am right, I am asking you to prove me wrong with your own research and not some government sponsored one.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:36 PM
link   
reply to post by MissSmartypants
 


Well it was more along the line of what I was wearing. I tend to see inner beauty. I am 28 years old. I am young but not that young.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by tpaine1809
You're not understanding the idea which is obviously way over your head so i'll let you go now.


You're right, I don't understand. Are you saying our scientists, with all of their toys, are unable to detect friggin' SUNS CHASING EACH OTHER in the center of our PLANET?

Are you calling the smartest guys on Earth morons?

Show me your Masters in geographical and solar science, and I might believe.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by biggmoneyme
 


No I am saying until you can prove me wrong with your own research then how credible are you? That is my point. I am not saying I am right, I am asking you to prove me wrong with your own research and not some government sponsored one.


no one is going to waste their time disproving such nonsense



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   
reply to post by biggmoneyme
 


The field is being projected from the interior out. The circular shape functions along the same lines as a magnetic motor. Your thinking of just one magnet attracting another. A circle of magnets behaves completely different. The electromagnetic field being generated would protect us from the inner suns.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by MissSmartypants
reply to post by tpaine1809
 


I have seen you in a video where you're wearing a tank top....and wearing it very nicely I might add.

To the other members...I think he means he isn't taken seriously because he's young and hot.


This is completely irrelevant. Stay on topic, as painful as it is. :bnghd:



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:38 PM
link   
I decided to watch the vid after I realized you made your own supporting evidence. I was hoping you'd do math on that whiteboard but you didn't. Just some circles and dots to illustrate your utterly complex idea.

Trying to relate light wave propagation to the earth....
2 suns or "atoms" spin around inside the earth...
Internal suns undergo cold fusion("not Uranium")....

Couldn't make it past those few nuggets.
Good luck with that high IQ



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by MissSmartypants
 



I have seen you in a video where you're wearing a tank top....and wearing it very nicely I might add.


Hubba, Hubba!!!!



I will REPEAT what I wrote, back on Page 1 (to remain topical):


Look......the mass of our planet is WELL known. It cannot, by definition, be "hollow".

This is science...and "science" is not a four-letter word ( it's a seven-letter word.. )

edit on Sun 12 February 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Starchild23
 


No they are just not given a reason to look for it. If no one is looking for something how can it ever be discovered? Goes back to my philosophy about Unknown Unknowns. We don't know that we don't know.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by biggmoneyme
 


The field is being projected from the interior out. The circular shape functions along the same lines as a magnetic motor. Your thinking of just one magnet attracting another. A circle of magnets behaves completely different. The electromagnetic field being generated would protect us from the inner suns.


I'm sorry, what part of "two suns inside of Earth is impossible" don't you understand?

Provide the exact science, including supporting material from ESTABLISHED scientists and PUBLISHED researchers that would prove this is, in fact, possible.

I might start a thread about a carebear invasion, if all I need is a video of myself explaining it.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   
Why do masons look to the "Star in the East" . Why is it treated like it is something different than the "Star in the west" ?



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by Starchild23
 


No they are just not given a reason to look for it. If no one is looking for something how can it ever be discovered? Goes back to my philosophy about Unknown Unknowns. We don't know that we don't know.


How the heck do you think we theorized about the center of the planet? By STUDYING it!


edit on CSundaypm262642f42America/Chicago12 by Starchild23 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by tpaine1809
Why do masons look to the "Star in the East" . Why is it treated like it is something different than the "Star in the west" ?


I'm lost...how is this connected with the impossibility of TWO SUNS inside of a PLANET?



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by Starchild23
 


No they are just not given a reason to look for it. If no one is looking for something how can it ever be discovered? Goes back to my philosophy about Unknown Unknowns. We don't know that we don't know.



Ah...so you're a philosopher. That explains everything.


Good luck with your fallacies. This is why we pay taxes for you to go to school.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:49 PM
link   
Orion's belt points to the area of the Eastern star or Sirius B. Sirius B is one of the two suns. Sirius A is the other.

This is where the biblical story comes from the three kings pointing to the star in the east to witness the "birth of the sun/son of god".
edit on 12-2-2012 by tpaine1809 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:50 PM
link   
...uh, what?


I think the moon is made entirely of palladium


This is a line taken directly from your video. Are you serious? You're not? You sure...okay. Whew, almost had me.

The moon is not made of pure palladium, and this line has single-handedly sacrificed every God-willing chance you had of being taken seriously.

A good day to you sir...hopefully, you have more luck with your "theory", as it were.


edit on CSundaypm333350f50America/Chicago12 by Starchild23 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Starchild23
 


It is silver in color isn't it? What is it made of Mr. Super genius?



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:56 PM
link   
I have no knowledge to claim what your saying is false or true...

But when I first ran into the "Hollow Earth theory" I couldn't stop thinking about it, not because it made perfect sense, because like I said I don't know enough.. But isn't the earth being solid also a theory?

The other thing that wouldn't let disregard the theory was Admiral Byrd. How can we take what he said and wrote down as just a crazy out of the blue idea and EXPERIENCE.. I mean he was real, he wrote it down, he seemed to be highly respected in the Government and Navy. From what I read he lead the Naval exploration to the North Pole and that's where the theory starts. (google Admiral Byrd and have fun reading..)

But that alone wont let me throw away a theory as fascinating as the Hollow Earth. Just my thoughts.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join