It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Biigs
Whats your point exactly?
2nd
Originally posted by Biigs
Whats your point exactly?
2nd
Originally posted by Biigs
Well i live on this planet and i didnt cry for whitney, dont include us all with such general (and vauge) humanitarian failures.
So you point is simply; that some people care more about a dead drug addict singer, than a million starving people.
I dont think thats accurate, honestly.
You initially started with a sarcastic quip. then, I assume out of embarassment and/or stuborness dig yourself in deeper with this.
Originally posted by Biigs
Well i live on this planet and i didnt cry for whitney, dont include us all with such general (and vauge) humanitarian failures.
So you point is simply; that some people care more about a dead drug addict singer, than a million starving people.
I dont think thats accurate, honestly.
Originally posted by Biigs
Well i live on this planet and i didnt cry for whitney, dont include us all with such general (and vauge) humanitarian failures.
So you point is simply; that some people care more about a dead drug addict singer, than a million starving people.
I dont think thats accurate, honestly.
Originally posted by Biigs
What is the correct amount of compassion for a specific scenario?
Is it possible that whitney houston fans can care about more than one thing at a time? *gasp*