I agree, Dont believe "them".
Even from their simulation it doesnt look right.
Plenty of Demolition experts say it was Demolished. There has never been a metal framed building in the world
collapse from fire damage previously. And NY had 3 in one day?
I smell a rat...

Originally posted by Lexx790
I agree, Dont believe "them".
Even from their simulation it doesnt look right.
Plenty of Demolition experts say it was Demolished. There has never been a metal framed building in the world
collapse from fire damage previously. And NY had 3 in one day?
I smell a rat...

Just curious, how many is "plenty" and can you source them? And do they still hold this position in 2012?

OOh, magic fires that make all the interior support columns fail simultaneously after 7 hours of fire.

Color me convinced!

With this knowledge perhaps it would smart to evacuate all over lower Manhattan. These high rise buildings are all deathtraps!

I didn't know we had a Department of Comedy, when did this start?

Can anyone who believes WTC 7 was a controlled demolition explain to me what was the perps original plan.

It was by chance that falling debris struck it, set fires and cut off the water supply. So what was the plan ? Just to blow it up as it stood in broad daylight ? Seem likely ?

Originally posted by Alfie1

Can anyone who believes WTC 7 was a controlled demolition explain to me what was the perps original plan.

It was by chance that falling debris struck it, set fires and cut off the water supply. So what was the plan ? Just to blow it up as it stood in broad daylight ? Seem likely ?

How could someone that looks at the building in free-fall, whom deduces the cause is from controlled demo, know what the "plan" was? The plan was to remove the building. Ask a stupid question, get this kind of answer.

Why don't you sit back for a moment, and think about what it takes to drop a building like seven fell. If you would stop thinking about sprinklers for one second, you might realize that a fire would not destroy all the vertical support columns at the same freaking time. It is all about timing and synchronization. If it was caused by debris and fires, some of the sprinklers would have functioned, saving most if not all of the building.

People ether have the common sense and physics understanding to see that this was 100% controlled demo, or they don't. So sorry you don't see the forest, for the trees are right in front of you. The evidence is in the videos of the building dropping. Half the people I talk to do not even know about 7 and it's bs fiasco.

You have seen the videos. You have heard the logic. Yet you ask for the observers to provide you with the thoughts of the terrorizers. Come on man, think B4 you post.

You people sound like a broken record.

How did it catch fire in the first place? There were buildings a lot closer to the towers, that did not catch fire.

I like to follow the money, and on that deceitful day, its amazing how insurance policies had been raised-EXCESSIVELY, and even the gold taken out from one of the towers previously. If that does not tell you the truth, and you believe the govt story, nothing else you need to know.

Originally posted by allprowolfy
I like to follow the money, and on that deceitful day, its amazing how insurance policies had been raised-EXCESSIVELY, and even the gold taken out from one of the towers previously. If that does not tell you the truth, and you believe the govt story, nothing else you need to know.

Why are the insurance companies happy to pay out? If it's so obvious to you and other laymen that this was suspicious then why have they not refused to honour the claim? Or at the very least mounted some form of investigation?