It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lexx790
I agree, Dont believe "them".
Even from their simulation it doesnt look right.
Plenty of Demolition experts say it was Demolished. There has never been a metal framed building in the world
collapse from fire damage previously. And NY had 3 in one day?
I smell a rat...
Originally posted by Alfie1
Can anyone who believes WTC 7 was a controlled demolition explain to me what was the perps original plan.
It was by chance that falling debris struck it, set fires and cut off the water supply. So what was the plan ? Just to blow it up as it stood in broad daylight ? Seem likely ?
Originally posted by Cassius666
How did it catch fire in the first place? There were buildings a lot closer to the towers, that did not catch fire.
How did it catch fire in the first place?
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by lunarasparagus
"Having a collapse of this nature is a very rare event."
Yet it happened 3 times on the same day. I also love how they mention it couldn't be explosive because it would be too loud and it would have been heard and picked up by cameras... but they don't mention anything about the thermite theory, even though military grade thermite particles were found in the dust. Pure propaganda.
Originally posted by allprowolfy
I like to follow the money, and on that deceitful day, its amazing how insurance policies had been raised-EXCESSIVELY, and even the gold taken out from one of the towers previously. If that does not tell you the truth, and you believe the govt story, nothing else you need to know.
then why have they not refused to honour the claim? Or at the very least mounted some form of investigation?
its amazing how insurance policies had been raised-EXCESSIVELY,